Violent Media is Good for Children In the article “Violent Media is Good for Children” by Gerald Jones, Jones states that Violent media does not necessarily harm children. On the contrary, it releases certain aspects of their inner emotions like fear, greed and rage that children are told to depress and to some extent boosts their self-confidence. Jones also argues that "modern children are much more likely to grow up too passive, too distrustful of themselves, and too easily manipulated." because adults continue to protect them from all violence. Jones introduces his controversial argument using his personal experience, which allows him to successfully connect with readers. Additionally, her use of her son's story to gain credibility on how violent comics encourage children to overcome their fear and become stronger, confident, and courageous individuals. However, it should be noted that Jones' insufficient evidence and fallacious reasoning fail to make his argument compelling and compelling. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original Essay In his opening paragraph, Jones successfully engages his readers by describing his lonely and passive childhood. He explains that his shyness and introversion were mainly attributed to his strict upbringing. Jones' parents were wary of the violence and put up a wall between Jones and society. When I finished this part of the reading, I had a deep sense of his experience. In China, since we were children, our parents and teachers have given us a clear code of conduct. That's how bad violence is, no matter the situation. Using our words is the optimal solution. As we grow up, we realize that the world is complicated and that these rules suck in many complex situations. Unfortunately, we suffered in silence in most cases. Jones gets lucky thanks to Hulks, a Marvel Comics character. Jones was given the opportunity to self-explore his inner dark side by vicariously experiencing the Hulk's stories. The violent comics help Jones find his identity and career in a tortuous way. Readers like me, who were passive and cowardly in their youth, are inspired by Jones' statement that not all violence is bad and that sometimes it can help. Although Jones offers an alternative perspective for considering violent media, his article lacks evidence, making his main argument unconvincing to readers. One of the main problems with insufficient evidence is that there is no authoritative research or study with statistical truth to support its arguments. In contrast, throughout his article, Jones gains credibility largely through real-life examples and opinions. Jones begins to expand on his claims by discussing his professional career and his son's stories. Later, he mentions his three-year project with Dr. Melanie Moore, Ph.D., "claiming that heroic and combative storytelling helps young people improve their self-knowledge and sense of power." Obviously, this part is just Jones' opinion, rather than a reliable source to support his arguments. This is not only because Jones fails to provide any detailed information about his method of this study, but also because he fails to present any statistics or information..