BRT can be called a more flexible mass transportation system than others because it allows other tire vehicles to facilitate interconnection and improving performance in a guided manner (Deng and Nelson 2011). .Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”? Get an original essay Moreover, considering the political aspect of public transportation planning, the implementation of BRT can be carried out quickly , as before the next election cycle, which makes it attractive to them. . Nevertheless, BRT implementation in developed countries is slower than elsewhere due to planners' and policymakers' preference for metro or rail systems and also due to funding regulations, including extensive processes of public participation (Nikitas and Karlsson 2015). BRT is associated with a complex set of actors and stakeholders within the social and technical dimensions of the city, making it difficult to implement and operate smoothly. Studies show that neither BRT has only advantages over other modes of public transport, nor that examples of BRT system implementation are always successful (Nikitas and Karlsson 2015). However, BRT can be considered a second choice to rail alternatives, although it is less permanent than a rail system. Urban planners often question BRT's ability to stimulate land development based on this argument. The fact that BRT is cheaper to implement than a rail system does not compensate for its capital intensity. On the other hand, BRT is much more expensive than any conventional bus system. The funding approval process often takes a long time, as it reduces the window of time needed for the actual implementation of the project. The protest arises from car owners, because the construction of a bus lane means limiting the space for cars in relation to the road. Although in theory, implementing BRT could increase the amount of road space for other vehicles. Thus, the implementation of BRT is entirely limited by institutionalism rather than inherent conceptual problems. Buses with a high level of service (BHLS) in Europe can have a considerable influence when implemented under the concept of “co-modality” promoted by the EU – for example, coordination between bus operations. public transport fleet and parking management systems to promote dedicated BRT bus lines (Nikitas and Karlsson 2015). The following table provides an overview of the advantages and disadvantages of a BRT system based on its different attributes..