Introduction: Whether or not women should be allowed in combat is a widely debated topic. Throughout history we have seen men fight in wars and some argue that it should stay that way. The question is, why? Different biological factors come into play. First, men were genetically designed to be more expendable than women. Men possess higher bone density, greater muscle mass and have much higher testosterone levels than women. This is due to their role in protecting pregnant women and the female body, in turn, has adapted to become the better guardian, as evidenced by higher body fat percentages and different pelvic sizes. These adaptations are primarily for childbirth and do not contribute to a woman's ability to perform well in combat. Thesis Statement: This is why some argue that women should not be allowed to participate in combat, which will be discussed in more detail in this essay. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essayTopic Sentence: To continue with the notion of biological evidence for women who are not fighting in the military, we should look in more detail at what should be allowed to them. To fill the modern military, men and women have been proven to be virtually the same when it comes to understanding and capabilities of aircraft, so they should most certainly be allowed to continue in this field. Evidence and Citations: Nurses, although this doesn't require much explanation, women are naturally better caregivers and are actually quite attracted to nursing work, which also has a biological explanation for this, as nurses Women are attracted to jobs that help people, which is why the average nursing field is overwhelmingly female, which is reflected in the work cited. “There are approximately 10 times more women in the nursing field. » Additionally, women should also be able to fight in ground troops, except in desperate need for manpower, such as in the IRA and/or Soviet Army; However, the Soviets were content to confront the enemy through an average ordinary citizen for no real tactical reason, so take them with a grain of salt. To continue we should look at the pros and cons of having women in the army, these come from Nikolai Pankov, a respected military general of the Russian army, here is a summary of his words on this subject. Topic sentence: For women and men, compulsory military service is currently the subject of heated debate, and it is no secret that in some countries around the world, compulsory military service for women is already a reality. Evidence and quote: The most famous country is Israel. Here, about 90% of all military specialties are available to women. Single women aged 18 to 24 are eligible. Additionally, girls from religious families or students of religious schools may be exempt from compulsory conscription. The lifespan of Israeli women is less than that of men and is 24 months. Compulsory service in the army and for women in North Korea. Here, the "fair sex", as it is called in this context in the EU and Asian countries, serves in special units separated from men for up to seven years, having said this, it is obvious that the DPRK is considered one of themost militarized countries. countries of the world. In free Europe, there is also a country where military service for women is compulsory, Norway. In 2014, it became the only European country to make calling women mandatory. Their lifespan is expected to be 19 months. Moreover, over the four years of the "appeal to women", experts noted that they gradually got used to the fair sex, and the presence of women even disciplined the soldiers. As for Russia, while military service is available to girls only by contract. At the same time, judging by polls, there is no consensus on this issue in our society. But perhaps the position of the militaryexpert, retired colonel Anatoly Matviychuk, which he shared during his conversation with Tsargrad, is quite sensible. To conclude with a quote from Mr. Pankov: “My personal opinion as men is that it is a shame for us that women serve in the army. Must serve men. But today, the democratic situation is such that women are replacing men in military service. I think that combat positions should remain reserved for men, and logistics and assistance positions for women. » To follow the advantages and disadvantages, we will have to go back a little to what has been said previously. But some advantages and disadvantages of women serving are: Some female service members have proven themselves to be physically, mentally and morally capable of leading and executing combat-type operations; as a result, some of these Marines may feel qualified for the chance to take on this role. Topic Sentence: Ultimately, the main concern is not whether women are capable of conducting combat operations, because we have already proven that we can defend ourselves in very difficult combat situations; rather, the main concern is a matter of longevity. Evidence and Citations: Can women withstand the physical and physiological rigors of sustained combat operations, and are we prepared to accept the attrition and medical problems that accompany integration? – Captain Katie Petronio, United States Marine Corps, served in combat in Afghanistan and Iraq. Comment: Although the majority of jobs in the armed forces are open equally to men and women, there are some for which women are simply not physically suited. Fitness standards were set to suit men, and women who attempt to achieve them will push themselves. Additionally, combat units engage in activities tailored to the capabilities of the men. As a result, women serving in integrated units will experience higher injury rates. Moving on, some women will be able to meet the required standards, but most will not. Although combat integration of women is possible for those who are qualified, the small numbers compared to the additional logistical, regulatory, and disciplinary costs associated with integration are not worth it. Additionally, having women serve in direct combat will hinder mission effectiveness by harming morale and unit cohesion. Pregnancy can affect a unit's deployability when it has a disproportionate number of women or is understaffed. Men, especially those likely to enlist, retain traditional gender roles. In some situations, men may act stupidly to protect women in their combat units. Topic sentence: Harassment and resentment towards the presence of women in a hyper-masculine military subculture would becomeprobably a problem. Evidence and Quotes: Male and female prisoners are at risk of torture and rape, but misogynistic societies may be more willing to mistreat female prisoners. Comment: Both men and women have the option to join the military, but with the understanding that different roles require different physical and emotional attributes. This should mean that there are multiple avenues for promotion so that women have equal opportunities without having to fight to participate in combat operations. Now let's move on to some benefits of women's military service. Topic Sentence: As long as a candidate is qualified for a position, their gender is arbitrary. It is easy to recruit and deploy women who are in better shape than many men sent into combat. It is possible to calibrate recruitment and training standards for women. Additional pre-workout for muscle building can also be used to reduce injury rates in women. On the modern high-tech battlefield, technical expertise and decision-making capabilities are increasingly valuable than simple brute force. Allowing a mixed force arguably helps maintain the strength of the army. All-volunteer forces are severely disrupted by declining retention and recruitment rates. Expanding the candidate pool for all jobs ensures more motivated recruits. Women who choose to become active combatants are unlikely to evade their duty by becoming pregnant after a draft, as these women voluntarily joined the military. The blanket restriction on women limits the ability of commanders in theater to choose the most competent person for the job. Training will be necessary to facilitate the integration of women into combat units. Cultures change over time and male subculture can evolve as well. Many previously male professions have been successfully opened to women over the past century. Evidence and Citations: Additionally, in the modern combat world (Afghanistan, Iraq), all women serving in the military are exposed to "frontline risks." Commentary: Support for women serving in the armed forces has not waned as warfare has changed, a clear sign that the need for women's combat service is recognized. Topic sentence: Women are more effective than men in certain circumstances. Allowing women to serve doubles the talent pool for delicate and sensitive jobs that require interpersonal skills, which not all soldiers possess. Having a broader personnel base allows the military to have the best soldiers, and the greatest number of diplomats, working to end the conflict quickly. As combat duty is generally considered necessary for promotion to senior officer positions, denying this experience to female personnel ensures that very few of them will ever reach the highest ranks of the military, reinforcing even more sexism. Women must have the same opportunities as men, in the military, in order to have the same opportunities, they must be exposed to the same risks. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. .Get Custom EssayConclusion Paragraph: In conclusion, although there are some advantages to having women in the military, which are mainly social benefits, women should stay away from the front lines because there are many ways it could be good.