-
Essay / Settler Resistance in the French and Indian War
Everything happens for a reason, but sometimes a person has to determine whether what is happening is justifiable or not. This was the case with British policies adopted after the French and Indian War, also known as the Seven Years' War. We must look closely at whether the colonists had the right to resist the policies imposed on them at the time. The causes, context, and overall outcome of the French and Indian War were the reason why many policies were adopted, which in turn were resisted by the majority of American colonists. The North American conflict that existed at this time was between Britain and France and changed the direction and history of an entire nation. The war began in 1754 and ended with the Treaty of Paris in 1763. The war brought Britain huge territorial gains in North America, but disputes over policies and actions and over the payment of the resulting war expenses led to colonial discontent and ultimately the American Revolution. Britain and France have always been neck and neck when it came to colonial powers. They constantly had disagreements and problems among themselves, even outside of the control of the colonies of the United States of America. Yet the focus will be on their conflict with the United States which, in turn, changed and shaped the course of this region's history. The main reason there was any rivalry between them was that both colonial powers viewed the new world as one of their greatest sources of revenue and as one of the greatest additions to their already huge empires. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”?Get the original essay “The war between France and India resulted from ongoing border tensions in North America, as imperial officials and French and British colonists sought to expand each country's power. sphere of influence in border regions. Both countries wanted to maintain their active influence in the region while retaining their power, and eventually taking over. They also wanted their source of money and income to continue to flow regularly, so as not to eventually fail. The problem, however, was that the boundary between French and British possessions was not well defined. This became a problem when the lands of the upper Ohio River Valley became their dispute. The French had built several forts in this region in an attempt to strengthen their claim to the territory. However, the British colonial army, led by Lieutenant Colonel George Washington, attempted to get rid of the French in 1754. Unfortunately for them, they were outnumbered and, in turn, defeated by the French. When news of Washington's failure reached then-British Prime Minister Thomas Pelham-Holles, Duke of Newcastle, he called for a swift, undeclared retaliatory strike. However, his enemies in his own government's cabinet evaded him by making strike plans public, thereby alerting the French government. This completely transformed a quick battle into a full-scale war. This event, in turn, proves that the causes of the French and Indian War had been brewing for a long time, before the war even began, and would eventually lead to results that would forever change American history. France had slowly expanded further into the Ohio River Valley, an area already under British control. ThisThis event led the British to fight against these French expansions on their territory. They had slowly taken control and renamed the regions New France. This event was the final straw for Britain. The war officially began in 1753 when the British demanded that the French forcibly leave Fort LeBoeuf, which they claimed had been built on British territory. The French opposed it, claiming that it had been built on their own territory. Thus, the British captured several French forts and in return, the French retaliated against the British troops and attacked the fort.Necessity. This is when the war officially began. According to Rebecca Brooks, “France considered the Ohio River Valley to be part of the colony of New France and Britain considered it to be part of the colony of Virginia. The region had several valuable resources, such as a vibrant fur trade industry as well as access to the Ohio River, which provided a vital transportation corridor for the region. The Ohio River Valley was an extremely important territory for both Britain and France. This allowed the British to expand east into mainland America, while the French saw it as an expansion of their current territory, causing both superpowers to want to control the land as it would benefit their empires. For the French, this would help glue their extensive territories north into Canada and south into Mississippi. Whereas, for the British, settlers from neighboring states wanted to colonize the valley. With this land, the region would bring great financial benefit to whoever owned it. The French could continue to trade on the Mississippi River and whoever controlled the Ohio River would control trade in continental America. The escalation of the war escalated as they both wanted to claim the region for themselves, which ultimately led to the results that they had to resolve in a reasonable manner. This war did not start well for the British. The British government sent General Edward Braddock to the colonies as commander-in-chief of the British Army in North America, but he rebuffed potential Indian allies who were willing to help him and the colonial leaders did not failed to cooperate with him. On July 13, 1755, Braddock died after being mortally wounded during an attack on a failed attempt to capture Fort Duquesne, located in present-day Pittsburgh. The war in North America ended in a stalemate in which neither side was able to make progress over the next few years, while in Europe the French won a significant naval victory and captured possession British Minorca in the Mediterranean in 1756. However after 1757 the war began to turn in Britain's favor. The British army defeated the French army in India, and in 1759 British forces invaded and conquered Canada. Throughout the colonies, the message was clear: what had happened was too serious and would not be tolerated and the government should come down hard on the settlers. After a clear and decisive British victory against the French in Montreal, Canada, the British, French and Spanish came together for the Treaty of Paris in 1763. During the peace conference it was decided what would be made with the French and Spanish territories. For the victors of this war, they caused much resentment in Europe and the United States. “The war brought Britain huge territorial gains in AmericaNorthern, but disputes over subsequent border policy and payment of war expenses led to colonial discontent and, ultimately, the American Revolution. » To further fuel their global war against France and its allies, Great Britain had to rely primarily on money from its allies in Europe, such as Prussia, to fight against the French. They also taxed their new colony very heavily to finance their military operations in North America. The final battle to end the war took place in Montreal, Canada, where the British army successfully routed the remaining French forces. The French surrendered and the Treaty of Paris was signed in 1763. The treaty required the French to give up all their territories in North America and the Spanish had to give up their control of Florida, but Cuba was returned to them. Most treaties, once signed, were written that the warring powers would end wars with an equal distribution of power. However, in this treaty the only real winner was Britain, which caused the French to hate the British even more and later take revenge. They were not the only ones exasperated by the new British policy. The newly acquired colonists did not like being taxed on exported goods without being represented in Parliament. To further anger them in order to cover war debts, they taxed the colonists on all printed paper. The Stamp Act was implemented in 1765 and imposed direct taxes on all materials printed for colonists. “The Stamp Act was passed by the British Parliament on March 22, 1765. The new tax was imposed on all American colonists and required them to pay a tax on every piece of printed paper they used.” Everything was taxed, from playing cards, legal documents, newspapers, ship's papers, licenses and other publications. If it was something that was printed on paper, a compulsory tax was imposed on it. The overall result of the Stamp Act was resistance and opposition from the settlers. They did not approve of what was being done to them and eventually had the law revoked, although Britain still felt it had the right to impose actions on the people. Also at this time, Britain needed to bail out its own commercial tea industry in the British East Indies by taxing them on tea without being represented in Parliament, which it rebelled against, sparking the American Revolution. This event marked the beginning of the end of the war, but led to the passing of many more laws, and ultimately another war. After the French and Indian War, the British were heavily in debt and in 1763 the British Parliament passed the Tea Act to bail out the British East India Company. From a financial point of view, their situation was not good, so to solve the problem, similar products would be boycotted and they would be allowed to sell their tea at a lower price with a small tax. This however did not sit well with the colonialists who were still angry at the other taxes imposed on them, and they also feared that the British East India Company would have a monopoly on the trade. “The law granted the company the right to ship its tea directly to the colonies without first landing it in England, and to commission agents who would have the exclusive right to sell tea in the colonies. » This tea law, promulgated in 1763, due to Great Britain's heavy debt after the French-Indian War, was a failure from the start. To improve their financial situation, the.