My demandI advocate for the right to die. If someone has a terminal illness that: 1) causes them great pain - the pain they suffer outweighs their will to live (clarification below) 2) wants to commit suicide and is healthy of mind, so that his desire is reasonable. In this context, “sound mind” means the ability to reason logically and not act on impulses or emotions. 3) the pain cannot be reduced to the point where they no longer want to commit suicide, so they should have the right to commit suicide. It should not be considered wrong to give someone the tools to commit suicide. The purpose of the three requirementsThe first requirement – ​​which causes great pain – is based on the word “euthanasia” which comes from the ancient Greek “eu” – good and “thanatos” – death. Plato held that suicide was against the will of the gods and was therefore wrong. He says patients unable to live normally should be denied treatment. Aristotle believed that suicide was wrong because the law prohibited it. Hippocrates, the father of medicine, was against active euthanasia. In his famous "Hippocratic Oath", a line prohibits giving a "deadly drug" [9][11]. In medieval times, assisted suicide was illegal. Thomas Aquinas argued that suicide goes against self-love and the desire to continue to exist. He also viewed suicide as a violation of God's right to decide how long one lives. This is weak once we examine the reasons why murder is bad. Murder is wrong for a variety of reasons – denying someone the right to life, causing people to fear being murdered, causing grief to their loved ones, etc. All of these elements are inapplicable to assisted suicide. The person has given up their right to life by consenting to suicide, there is no fear that would be caused if only those who are terminally ill and consenting were killed, and grief is inevitable anyway because death is imminent. an analogy with starving children [1]. This analogy is invalid because the reason assisted suicide is sought is to relieve suffering and has no relation to the “value” of human life. Finally, they argue that allowing assisted suicide will cause people to commit suicide [1]. This is an extremely weak argument. By this logic, many things should be banned: for example, alcohol will be banned because allowing it will mean people will be pushed to drink. Furthermore, this raises a question: it assumes the conclusion as a premise. The premise is that allowing assisted suicide causes pressure to commit suicide, and there is an implicit premise that committing suicide is bad, but that is exactly the conclusion they are trying to draw.