Throughout the history of equality, restitution, and human rights in the United States of America, same-sex marriages have been one of the most scandalous debates in the country. Gay and lesbian citizens of the United States knew that their constitutional rights had been denied or set aside by their own government. They are citizens from the lower class to the upper economic class, who pay their taxes, serve their society, and by law they should not be deprived of the rights afforded to other citizens. Discrimination, isolation, judgment and injustice towards sexual orientation are some of the problems that the gay community has suffered for many years. However, although it is stipulated in the constitution that no one should be denied their rights because of their sex, gender or color, society and some leaders have condemned this community and put them in isolation. For example, the Church has declared that the Bible condemns homosexuality, which is why many states of Christian belief have declared that homosexual relations are immoral and violate the sacred institution of marriage. Meanwhile, many states forget that the Constitution states that U.S. citizens are allowed to practice any religion or practice no religion. Religious views and condemnation have clearly been a major challenge that same-sex marriage has faced throughout its path to success. Through numerous legal fights and countless public protests across the country, the fight for same-sex marriage has been and remains a very tough and unstoppable battle for the gay community. Case after case and failure after failure have been the resilient battle of the gay community for many years without chanting to give up until they get what they want “equality for all Americans”. Marriage equality was achieved through perseverance and dedication. Here are some of the major notorious and unmentioned paths the gay community takes to achieve same-sex marriage in the United States. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay One of the first same-sex marriage trials took place in Minnesota. "On May 18, 1970, two University of Minnesota students, Richard John 'Jack' Baker and James Michael McConnell, applied to Hennepin County District Court Clerk Gerald Nelson for a marriage license. He denied the request, as the applicants were both men The couple were angry at the decision and decided to take the case to court This case took place on October 10, 1972 and it was the case of Baker v. Nelson. which the Minnesota Supreme Court ruled that a state law limiting marriage to members of the opposite sex did not violate the U.S. Constitution, but same-sex marriage was not part of that right. Ultimately, the case went to the Washington, D.C. Supreme Court, but it was dismissed because the court assumed that the plaintiffs in this civil case had violated the United States Constitution in some way. on the other, which was not said at the time. Ultimately this lawsuit, many states used the court's ruling as a springboard to block any efforts toward marriage equality in the country. Following this lawsuit in 1973, the state of Maryland became the first to ban same-sex marriage in the country, as did many others to follow a similar, or even worse, ban on same-sex marriage. Manysmall protests took place here and there, but the most The “first mass sexual marriage ceremony on October 10, 1987” was significant and politically honest. During these events, hundreds of same-sex couples marched in Washington, DC, dressing as if they had just gotten married, demonstrating a direct political act that challenged the social, religious, and political barriers to same-sex marriage. It was about telling each state that they were men and women protected by the Constitution like all other American citizens. They responded to the injustice and inequality of a nation that was uniquely blocking its happiness, liberty, and liberty rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. This demonstration was a way of saying to everyone: “Let's overcome our hatred towards what we are fighting against for ridiculous and irrational reasons, based on ignorance, lack of information, immorality and erroneous assumptions, from religious and homophobic groups. themselves as human beings with the right to be happy like everyone else. Another breaking point for same-sex marriage was the Baehr v. Mike (1993). The origin of this case was that Nina Baehr claimed that the State of Hawaii had refused to issue her and her same-sex partner a marriage license. That’s why she sued the State of Hawaii for unlawful gender discrimination. She took the case to court, and the Hawaii Supreme Court found her case to have merit. The Court ruled that the state's ban on same-sex marriage discriminates on the basis of sex and that it violates the state's equal protection clause of the Fourteen Amendments to the U.S. Constitution written in 1868. However, this case simply shows that the same sex marriage was illegal under the constitution but did not change anything about same-sex marriage in the United States. Ultimately, the Supreme Court sent this case back to the lower courts and subjected it to evaluation using a compelling state interest test. This means that the matter must be scrutinized by states and proven that it will be in the best interest of society as a whole. In 1998, political events and legislation led to a ban on same-sex marriage in the states of Hawaii. On the other hand, the start of this case was the first time a state Supreme Court had ruled that gay marriage was constitutional, bringing more awareness to the gay community to advance its goal. A major event that opens the way. towards same-sex marriage occurred in the states of Utah. In 1995, Utah Governor Mike Leavitt signed into law the state's first Defense of Marriage Act, which clarified that Utah is not required to recognize out-of-state marriages that violate public policy of the state. This law condemns and discourages many gay Utah residents, because even if other states legalized same-sex marriage, there would still be no validation in their own state. To make things even more difficult for the homosexual movement, in 1996, President Bill Clinton touted the Defense of Marriage Act, as well as DOMA. This law defines marriage as the legal union between a man and a woman as husband and wife and defines spouse as "a person of the opposite sex who is husband or wife." This has been very controversial because this law will deny many federal benefits to those who have a same-sex partner. Many federal and state lawmakers and judges feared that the Baehr v. Miike lawsuit would force states to legalize same-sex marriage and later introduce it in other states across the country. Congress and..