Table of ContentsIntroductionBodyResultDiscussionWorks CitedSince human beings have been on earth, they have been caught up in subsequent developments and contrivances. Before that, these developments and advancements were intended for human life and survival. But over time, the influence has also changed. Although it once functioned as before, it also has an additional area. This relationship has today become a big concept that will later be called globalization. The concept of globalization. There is no doubt that terrorism and crime pose a threat to the country and to terrorists and groups that take advantage of globalization and spread throughout the world. However, this article analyzes the concept of globalization and its impact on terrorism and international crime. Current counterfeiting zone with scenes of international crime and terrorism. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essayIntroductionThis study will give the reader an insight into globalization in law enforcement, what will be the impact if it gives negative or positive effects depending on certain aspects. Additionally, it will enlighten these readers and likely allow them to better understand what events happened and what possible solutions to the problem being discussed are. In this topic, globalization as a rational basis for law enforcement will be discussed. In this concept, human science is the most fundamental element and ideal component of the theory, and at the same time, the most destructive part can be deception and controversy. The concept of globalization also fits comprehensive definitions of this category. This concept is not only other concepts of human science, but it is also floating and has no purpose. BodyGlobalization has affected many areas of human life through various tools, and cyberspace has played the most important role. Yet, cyberspace and globalization have brought many benefits to human life, whether as a tool or as a process. However, the process of globalization is valuable for humanity and should not be ignored. This article attempts to explain cybercrime in this era. Globalization focuses on global crime and related examples. The effects of the globalization of the national criminal law system have also been studied. The effect of globalization on social phenomena has led to this process being considered as an enormous social change in societies. Today, many socio-economic issues, such as peace, crime, immigration, production, employment, technological development, environmental threats, income distribution, prosperity, social unity and identity, are described as phenomena affected by globalization. International law, commercial law, criminal law and other branches of law are also affected by globalization. Moving away from the near and towards the distant has made law a global phenomenon. The question of whether or not we agree on the globalization of law is no longer relevant. It's a fact; law is globalizing and crises are often the start of this process. Globalization has influenced everything, such as crime, the criminal and the victim, the process of committing a crime, the method of trial, the grounds for proving a claim, criminalization and decriminalization, and penal policy. Globalization has created new challenges and has sometimes contributed to notresolve them. These are the invention of computers and access to cyberspace, which are contributing factors to globalization and the origin of cybercrime. Criminals for whom it is difficult, if not impossible, to detect their crimes in cyberspace. Additionally, the internationalization of the world and the removal of borders have created new opportunities for criminals in lucrative sectors, such as economic crime in organized crime. The evolution of communication networks has also made it easy to transfer huge funds at any given time. This will free offenders from police and judicial investigations. The diversification of organized crime into profitable sections is accompanied by the most sophisticated methods of action that require new methods of crime prevention. The main question is whether governments have acted simultaneously with the trend towards globalization to introduce criminal titles into criminal law and eliminate legislated offenses from this area. Are there any requirements or obstacles to these actions? What are these requirements and how are they determined? There are two main obstacles to aligning the crime and decriminalization process with globalization. One is the principle of territorial sovereignty of criminal laws and other cultural relativisms. The principle of territorial sovereignty of criminal laws aims that these laws are enforceable against all offenders within the territory of a country's territorial sovereignty and are not applicable outside it. Each country claims to have the most appropriate and efficient legal system than others, and with this idea, no country wants to lose its sovereignty under the influence of globalization. Since the principle of territorial sovereignty is sometimes not enough to resolve international criminal cases, the principle of personal jurisdiction has been represented. If the principles of territorial jurisdiction and personal jurisdiction are also not applicable, to resolve the defect, the principle of effective jurisdiction will be taken into account. Those accused of some of the crimes arrested in each country are tried according to the criminal laws of that country. If we do not distinguish between internationalization and globalization, as some have said, we can say that the globalization of law occurred in the crime of "piracy" for the first time. Then other crimes, such as drug and human trafficking, as well as sex tourism, were included in this process. Perhaps the most significant crime influenced by globalization is the crime of dictatorial regimes. As is evident, a significant part of 20th century history was accompanied by brutality and abuse, to which international communities responded. After the Holocaust and other crimes committed The liberation of borders in the process of globalization through the use of modern computer technologies has created a lot of problems for governments, which are not resolved individually. Legal barriers arising from the sovereignty of governments and the ease of crossing borders for offenders are two opposite poles of the globalization of rights for which a solution must be found to these problems. Furthermore, on the one hand, the international crimes expressed through these conventions reflect the value and convenience defended by the international community, knowing how to treat this as a crime. When denouncing human rights violations, the most ardent defenders of governmental sovereignty ignore this concept. In fact, according to human rights, the rights of different countries are coordinated. The standards havecontributed to the formulation of global laws. This harmony is located in a specific area. Due to differences in the concepts of discipline and justice, criminal law faces challenges. It is the main source of crime in every country and supported values. This has led to differences in the quality of countries that accept global rules. The government and the government are prepared to criminalize threatening behavior. Its main advantage is not only its desire to criminalize threatening behavior. Their people. By accepting international treaties in the field of criminal law, governments restrict or abolish them in matters of crime, punishment, treatment, trials, etc. But by accepting the principles and systems of law, the international human rights system has completely changed their penal system. Convergence, in fact, they are close to each other. The other obstacle is cultural relativism. Cultural relativism believes that legal principles depend on customs, traditions, environment and objective factors. The consideration of relativism in some countries has become an excuse to violate the Convention. The general principle of human rights which has a common border with criminal law, against those who really insist on the universality of these rights. The position of criminal law emphasizes that criminal policy must always deviate from a more comprehensive understanding of the real situation of the criminal phenomenon (and the factors that affect it), and give priority to ways of prevention, as a point more reliable view, emphasizing subsidiarity The nature of crime must always be committed to becoming more humane and effective peace and justice, strengthening the image of democracy, creating rights and at all levels of the penal system, fundamental penal and procedural assumptions can be fully protected. the universality of human rights is a new achievement of human rights civilization. Those who confront cultural relativism with the universality of human rights fail to understand cultural concepts and have failed to understand morality and its relationship to social behavior. In general, human rights standards do not belong to a specific culture. In fact, the legal translation is as follows: All human cultures that surround them can develop moral rights. Related Claims These specific cultural norms, on the one hand, insult other cultures, verifying the identity of specific cultures is more than sufficient. Pluralism therefore includes the coexistence of different ideas and forms the common characteristics of human rights. The obligation and defense of cultural diversity, and the obligation The universal vision of human rights is the Declaration of Cultural Diversity. The authors of the declaration having understood that cultural diversity and pluralism could be at the origin of human rights violations, the first part of the declaration is devoted to cultural diversity and human rights. Criminal law is a valuable system that fails to meet its requirements. Punishment is their guarantee of eternity and survival. Even in the process of globalization, the state system is forced to accept the reign of globalization, regardless of the wishes of the leaders. Criminology and decriminalization in the global value system are based on human rights norms and the desires of dictatorship, political and religious leaders, ideology and cultural relativism. They can't do anything. The condemnation, resolution, military attacks, arrest and trial of those who violate these rights areother guarantees. One of the most important liberal critiques of criminal law is the security and enforcement due to this part of the law. In this case, people may feel more danger and insecurity. This aspect of criminal law is not unrelated to the crime of globalization, particularly through cyberspace. This objection can also be raised in another way by extremist supporters of human freedom, because they oppose measures that restrict citizens without justification. Thus, excessive reliance on barriers and restrictions leads to the creation of a militaristic, coercion-oriented, executor-dependent society, or in other words, a quasi-fortress society. While in a civilized society the limits should be reduced as much as possible and human beings are limited to the legal framework, this situation is the transition from a social state to a criminal state or a state of social security. Today, a large number of criminal headlines related to cyberspace have increased the fear of crime among citizens. It is also worth mentioning the question of crime prevention and the effects of the repression of globalized crime which has given a security character to criminal law. The reason is that criminal law has entered most areas of life. Crime prevention tools also play the same role today. The development of crime prevention has created various branches of prevention that lead to security space in societies. So, with the assertion that global crime, such as cyberterrorism and organized cybercrime, is on the rise and therefore requires a response from the armed forces, the police have also entered cyberspace. Although lawyers place more importance on the rules of criminal trials to maintain community discipline and prevent crime and consider the police solely responsible for the detection and prosecution of crimes, it must be admitted that the police can be considered the most important crime prevention factor. because their essential role requires taking steps in advance and preparing to face future insecurities. Undoubtedly, the massive anti-crime apparatus adopted by the police, whether in the physical environment or in cyberspace, is the same, and the police will have the same place in preventing cybercrime. Indeed, the actions of the police are nothing more than a general policy to combat other crimes, but what makes the difference in this area are the unique characteristics of cybercrime, which requires its own implementation methods to achieve this general policy.ResultCriminal law is the highest level system of values ​​​​and norms. Indeed, when criminal protection with legal value is in the form of criminal titles. The importance of these rules is becoming more and more obvious to everyone. The mission of criminal law becomes even more important when it is linked to human values ​​and global human rights, because certain global human rights values ​​are also part of criminal law and therefore protected. Among them, in the era of globalization, it has been attributed to two parts of the law. section Part of this support is the responsibility of criminal law, and the other part is the responsibility of human rights. Since the creation of the United Nations in the middle of the last century, criminal law has also undergone some changes. After the changes of internationalization and globalization and the positive and negative changes that have impacted both, one of the most important developments in the.