Before considering social justice, it is important to understand why it is important. Social justice is a powerful idea in today's society, but its origins and meanings remain partially unclear. There is perhaps little or no doubt about the importance of this issue among people in both poor and rich countries. The following research regarding what I am going to discuss in this essay is about the concept of justice as it relates to the problems and impact of justice in terms of reducing the balance between rich and poor. Subsequently, the overall concept of justice will appeal to my argument about fairness. As this meaning is not contestable, it will demonstrate that models which are indecencies embodied in developing countries require another way of dealing with justice between rich and poor nations. However, in today’s gig economy, this is not the case. Case studies attempt to highlight the possibilities and limits of social justice as well as what can be done to make it a better outcome. It also talks about the conventions and principles set forth as to what society does to protect individuals who need to support their conditions. It even sets detailed definitions, while each definition is simply different from the person's perspective in rich and poor countries, such as social justice and equity, with each word described having its own meaning. However, no one can deny the gap between rich and poor, but it is gradually widening. Throughout the essay, I even concluded a context of distributive justice which concerns fairness but, on the other hand, it is said to be successful but it is always criticized. Some even argue that social justice is seen as a way to protect individuals and ensure that they are treated fairly. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay The definition set out by Susan Torres provides a useful starting point for explaining the key individual elements of each word, as opposed to the context in this definition under international law. As stated, social justice is the fundamental key to valuing "justice and equity in resources, rights and treatment for marginalized individuals and groups of people, who do not share equal power in society in because of their immigration, their race, their ethnic origin, their age, their socio-economic situation. , religious heritage, physical ability, or sexual orientation status groups. Before clearly being a member of society, each member deserves to have equal rights, opportunities and fairness, because the key elements and aspects of social justice are entirely linked to the fairness of society. Therefore, it is the very essence of all great spiritual teachings throughout society and without justice there can be no greater justice. To some extent, it is even fundamentally about trying to create a society so that all its members can lead fulfilling lives and have access to all institutions before helping the members of society realize their potential in the community. Furthermore, the meaning of justice is quite well expressed in a more colloquial term, as social justice takes the central idea of ​​justice to be fairness and fairness has often been used in relation to the ability to judge without reference to one's feelings or interests. can be heavily debated and is defined differently depending on whether it is from the perspective of the rich or the poor. The law is moderately acharacteristic instrument because it can both increase and decrease legal aid. A particular example of a law reducing legal aid is the Equality Act 2010, which legally protects individuals from segregation in the workplace and in society in general. However, there are many cases where this is not the case in the law protecting individuals from discrimination. However, individuals are still isolated. For example, women may not get a position because they are pregnant and then take paid leave. Additionally, there is still a pay gap between men and women and, essentially, they should be entitled to equal pay. It is very common for the gender pay gap to be a topic of potential interest, as even though it is reduced in the UK, it is still suggested that it is still in favor of men. However, as noted in the UK, it would appear that men earn more than women as national statistics indicate, and therefore the Equality Act must operate on the basis that as of April 2017, the gender pay gap for full-time reps narrowed to 9.1. % as in 1997, it was 17.4% as indicated by the ONS. Although over time this phenomenon has decreased, it is not yet socially, because people are not treated equally and instead are victims of negative discrimination until today. In R (SG) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (2015) UKSC 16, (2015) 1 WLR 1449, the inquiry was whether the benefit cap was justifiable. The cap limits total household income from social benefits to a fixed amount, regardless of the family's subsistence needs. The parties agree that this was implicitly detrimental to women. Lady Hale said the question must be asked whether the benefit cap applies to single parents and whether it can be justified regardless of its discriminatory effects. Considering this, Lady Hale concluded that the cap will deprive children of their basic needs which may not be in their best interests and that, therefore, the indirect sex discrimination inherent in the implementation of the cap is not a proportionate way of achieving its objectives. Therefore, the most unfavorably influenced were single guardians with at least 3 or more children living in housing that was generally rented at a high price. They were negatively influenced by being less likely to escape the impact of the cap and by moving to a new house and getting a job. The vast majority of these lone guardians were women and statistics show that 90% of lone guardians are women in the UK. We even see that agreements representing those working in the gig economy are an example of new exploitative work models and authoritative commitments in common law. . And they feel like they will never be able to do justice again, as Uber and Deliveroo show. These two organizations could control business law to their benefit, Uber workers are classified as independent employees working in a gig economy due to adaptable work schedules, as they have little or no security or job security. commercial insurance. Looking at the discussion of social justice in relation to distributive justice in a national and international context, distributive justice is more concerned with the equitable distribution of resources among various members of a community. The principles in this regard are normative principles designed to distribute goods in limited quantity byrelationship to demand. The principles vary according to which goods are subject to the distribution of income, wealth, opportunities and according to the nature of the subjects of distribution and on the basis of the goods distributed. One of the simplest principles of distributive justice is that of strict or radical equality. The principle even says that each person should have the same level of goods and services. However, distributive justice is therefore best viewed as providing moral guidance to political processes and structures that affect the distribution of benefits and burdens in societies. Beyond this, the UN often characterizes poverty as a vicious cycle made up of a series of associated factors that make it difficult to overcome. Contrary to what happens, many societies prevent individuals from enjoying their rights simply based on who exists or cannot afford them. Discriminatory laws, policies and practices may suggest that these groups are denied even the rights to a high standard of health, work and adequate housing. In the case study, the concept of social justice can have an impact as laws can affect citizens' opportunities for freedom. Laws also control the provision and determine whether or not assets, for example education, health care and housing, are accessible to people based on their race, ethnicity, age, socio-economic, religious, heritage , physical ability or sexual orientation. To the extent that laws discriminate against people based on their registration in a specific social gathering, they have a substantial impact not only on who but also on how people can embody and exercise their personhood, but they can also influence their access to social benefits that respond to convergent types of poverty. Furthermore, what is being put in place also concerns refugees and is more about an individual having protective security. Therefore, asylum seekers become refugees when immigration authorities decide whether the individual meets the international definition of a refugee. Furthermore, international law states that for an individual to become a refugee, they must clearly meet the criteria for refugee status, as set out in the 1951 convention article. International and European law on the basis of Refugees is an example of international and European law relating to refugees. socially just and a measure of reducing the balance between rich and poor, affirming that the law gives asylum seekers and refugees the chance of a higher life by allowing them to reside in their country of origin, if their lives are in danger in their country of origin. The Dublin Regulation is a measure of European law which meets this objective. Article 6(4) of Regulation (EU) No. 604/2013 states that a State Party in which an unaccompanied child has applied for asylum, the best interests of the child must be protected. The law instantly promotes social justice because it considers the prosperity and best interests of the child before anything else. In the 1951 convention, Article 31 even states that refugees are protected against sanctions in the event of illegal entry. The law embraces human rights and even promotes social justice and sustainability since it ensures that people in danger or at risk by helping them move to a safe country. assessed by examining the definition in Annex I of the Procedures Directive, which states that, taking into account: the legal situation of a country, the application of law in a democratic system and general political circumstances… it There is generally andsystematically no persecution…, no torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment and no threat due to indiscriminate violence in situations of international or internal armed conflict. Although the 1951 convention article imposes an obligation on states to treat refugees without discrimination based on their nation of origin, the Asylum Procedures Directive and its recast have enabled EU countries to divide asylum seekers into various categories, with nationals of certain third countries receiving less favorable procedural treatment than others. This may raise fundamental tensions with the obligation to view the convention as the foundation of refugee protection in the EU4 and to refrain from any elucidation of EU refugee rights that could undermine it. According to Lady Hale's speech, the case study is entirely related to many infectious diseases. which kill millions of people every year, including millions in developing countries. The main cases of illness and death are in the regions of Africa, Asia and South America, which represents the world's population infected with HIV/AIDS. The AIDS crisis has focused particular attention on how large numbers of people in the developing world do not appear to have access to drugs meant to treat illness or alleviate suffering. Constantly many more and more people are being killed due to AIDS in this developing society. The situations causing this are due to lack of access to essential medicines, but in many cases the high cost of medicines poses a particular barrier to accessing the required medicines or treatments. As we all know, drug prices are often due to strong intellectual property protection. This is why governments in developing countries are trying to reduce the cost of medicines before facing pressure from industrialized countries and the multinational pharmaceutical industry. As for joining the WTO, this equates to lower customs duties, which means more money for the owner of the medicines. In this regard, the World Trade Organization partly sets standards for the overall protection of intellectual property, including patents for pharmaceutical products, which have been criticized due to the effects that increased levels of patent protection will have on drug prices. medicines are vital for the survival of millions of people; they are already too expensive for most people in poor countries, either because they are unaffordable, because they have become ineffective due to resistance, or because they are not sufficiently adapted to the conditions and specific local constraints. The law, on the other hand, will not provide a socially just outcome like that of less economically developed countries and will not have the capacity to pay the cost of medicines from owners who have a monopoly due to the licenses required for travel. However, it protects the property rights of individuals, such that individuals cannot copyright their work and no one else can take credit for it without the consent of the owner. From this, one could conclude that the Doha Declaration takes a big step forward in ensuring that intellectual property protection serves the public interest and outlines the options countries have when prices of existing patented medicines are too high for their populations. Additionally, the law protects property more than it does, therefore human lives are wasted due to the enforcement of patent laws. . We can.