There are enough open doors in life for everyone to have a prosperous and happy future. However, there are also many things in life that can suddenly close these doors on you, such as war. War can never be justified because not only is it unethical, but it completely destroys the spirit of humans. Unfortunately, many people don't realize it at all, while some only think about it from time to time. People doubt the terrible effects of war because they often believe that war can be justified in some or all situations. Despite the idea that there is no solution to conflict other than war, nonviolent resistance is a reasonable method that should be studied because it can change our world for the better. Basically, just war theory explains how and why wars occur and asserts that war is justified in certain cases. There are three important parts of just war theory: Jus Ad Bellum, Jus In Bello and Jus Post Bellum. These parts apply to two enemies who have similarities in religion, race, or language. When values ​​are shared between these two groups, they generally agree on the limits of war, and that is when just war comes into play. However, when there are two groups that are not culturally similar or when there is a difference in rank, these rules do not apply in war. The reason this theory exists is so that enemies are able to understand who will participate in the war and what will happen in terms of relationships as a result of it. Often, when groups agree on certain conditions of just war theory, it is because it will benefit them in the long run and they will be able to avoid political or moral problems that have arisen in the past. . Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay In the first section titled “Jus Ad Bellum” of Just War Theory, there are six criteria for war. In a document created by Michael Lacewing, which contains full details of this idea, it is stated: "The response in declaring war must be proportionate, that is, the good that can be obtained by war must prevail over the evil that is most likely to occur. The end must justify the means. And in this calculation, the state must take into account not only the costs and benefits for itself, but also those which will affect everyone involved in the war. As has been proven time and time again, there is no sure answer to what might happen once the war ends. War can have many consequences: another country can attack, things can be taken into hand, and a crucial decision can even be made that changes everything. People who hold this theory and believe it to be correct argue that ending the war will make everything that happened during the war much better. This is totally wrong, as many countries are left to pick up the pieces and somehow get money back to pay for all the damage another country has done to them . Ultimately, a group can get what they want, but is all the destruction caused by war really necessary? This is especially true for wars that last a long time – so long that people completely forget what started them, and what started them. the goal is. The war on terrorism is a perfect example since it lastsfor sixteen years, since the September 11 attacks on the Twin Towers. In 2016, the United States dropped 26,171 bombs and most of these air attacks took place in Syria and Iraq. Other countries include Afghanistan, Libya, Yemen, Somalia and Pakistan. All of these countries were predominantly Muslim and many innocent people were killed by the drone attacks. The US government was convinced that it would kill anyone it wanted, until it actually killed the right person. They neglected the lives of so many people by lumping them into one and hoping the ending would be “justified.” None of these losses were ever acknowledged by the United States, and no one hesitated to provide war reparations to those cruelly affected by them. This brings us to the second section of just war theory called “Jus In Bellum”. This agreement talks about how the enemy should be treated by the opposing party. There are also six different criteria for this section, one being: "No weapon or means of warfare that is 'evil in itself' is permitted." Examples include ethnic cleansing and mass rape. This idea of ​​theory, just like all other ideas, is completely illusory. Just war theory does not accept that weapons are already "bad in themselves", even though this is demonstrably true. Weapons are intended to cause harm to others, mentally and physically. Once the engineer begins to make the instrument, it is destined only for destruction and harm. War has become so commonplace and mundane that using weapons to wreak havoc is no longer considered immoral. Although weapons are only one of the inhumane factors of war, another obscene aspect is sexual violence in war. Rape has been committed by combatants for a very long time, and it is simply something expected of war. During the Vietnam War, many attacks were carried out by South Korean and American soldiers. A Vietnamese woman posted her story on a petition website, where she explained how a soldier came and raped her and her mother in their store. Their lives were changed forever and they could do nothing but accept it. Many people's lives would not have been affected as they were if the war had never happened. This is another reason why just war theory would never work. It is truly impossible to prevent rape in a world where not everyone is fully aware of its consequences and effects. If women who were raped are still fighting today for the government to recognize the things they experienced, it is completely unreasonable to believe that citizens would ever stop committing these heartless crimes. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. a personalized article now written by our expert writers. Get a Custom Essay The final view of this theory is called “Jus Post Bellum”, which is the final aspect. This concludes the whole theory and talks about the consequences of war: “Discrimination between combatants (including political leaders) and non-combatants still applies when it comes to seeking punishment. Public and international trials for war crimes should be conducted. Related to the previous paragraph, many different war crimes remain completely unknown. There are international rules, in countries like Syria, that protect citizens and prisoners of war who do not participate. According to a CNN article, some of these war crimes include torture or inhumane treatment, deliberately causing suffering, causing serious..