The question on every scientist's mind today: Should CRISPR be used to enhance the genes of our offspring, who would then pass it on to subsequent generations? Looking at the cases where it has caused agitation during several debates, it becomes clear that gene editing is linked to different factors, such as: ethics, expenses, risks to human health and, ultimately , the notions of disparity within our future population. Say no to plagiarism. . Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”? Get an original essay The recent topic making the rounds in international media is the latest gene editing technique, CRISPR/Cas9. Although this machinery may change the face of science in the years to come – with its ability to cure congenital diseases and deepen our knowledge of the human genome – its critiques focus on topics like human moral decadence and related safety risks. . The highest authorities in different parts of the world have independently reached a conclusion regarding the use of CRSIPR in their countries, with many of them abandoning the idea of ​​exploiting it due to the foreseeable consequences. CRISPR, like any other recent medical therapy, poses a major ethical concern. Many fear that if it is used for genetic enhancement rather than medical treatments, it would eventually lead to a society full of "designer babies." This in turn would lead to a disparity within the population, as the entire society would be occupied by genetically rich and have-nots, as the lower class would not be able to afford such treatments and would therefore carry burdens. unmodified genes. (Lewis, 2015, no pagination) This issue could be associated with an emergence of eugenics, which is the racist practice of choosing who should or should not be adopted into a population based on their hereditary qualities. A historian of science, Daniel Kevles, at New York University recalled that eugenics was practiced everywhere, stating: "Eugenics was not unique to the Nazis." Adding: “It could – and has – happened everywhere. » Eugenics is likely to cause conflict between communities and possibly bloodshed due to discrimination against undesirable groups in society (Lewis, 2015, no pagination). History proves this since the German Nazis terrorized those who did not belong to the “race”, the Aryans. Some religious beliefs also revolve around abstinence from CRISPR use. Some experts argue that enhancing an embryo's germline through technical means is ignoring God's creations because it changes what God has already instilled in the specific being. This raises concerns that people are morally fallen to such an extent that they abuse the creation of the Almighty just to achieve something that suits them. It would be horrible to see people competing over who would be born. Parents should learn to love their children regardless of their appearance, behavior, or performance (King, 2017, no pagination). Aside from ethical concerns, CRIPSR could represent a financial burden for many underdeveloped countries if implemented. Countries around the world would prefer to have it because it would give them a better reputation around the world due to their advancement in the medical field. Science writer and New York Times columnist Carl Zimmer.