Table of ContentsReview and Analysis of the CaseCase One: Use of TechnologyCase Two: Distinction Between Public Space and Private LifeCase Three: Legitimacy of Technological SurveillanceConclusionReferenceOur Personal Lives Have been affected by the development of technology in recent years, and business environments, business principles and working arrangements are influenced and shaped by these developments. With technology, new business sectors are forming. At the same time, companies with a traditional work structure are affected by these developments and work environments are updated and developed. Thanks to the convenience of technology, it offers new equipment to its employees, changes the working hours of employees and provides comfort. It gains in efficiency compared to those who work with technology, and the physical effort of those who work decreases. With the development of technology, large-scale data is collected. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original Essay However, there are some negative aspects to these developments. For example, this collected data also contains private information about individuals. These types of attachments allow technology to be abused. At the same time, individuals may be affected by these developments and use technology in negative ways, affecting work life in general and decreasing their effectiveness. In this study, we will present an overview of the use of technology in the business world and its ethical structure. . We will examine the use of technology in business and its ethical connection. Likewise, we will examine how the integration and use of technologies in the business world helps meet the growing needs in the field of business development. As we mentioned earlier, technology provides us with a positive advantage in terms of business development, efficiency, time saving and workload reduction in the business world. However, as some people may abuse the technology, it will lead to certain problems. Case Review and Analysis Technology is developing day by day and becoming the most important part of our life. We are included in Big Data globally, as well as data collected from us for private use and private businesses. It would be impossible for us to think that global companies respect our data and keep and protect this information confidentially. By subscribing to the membership offered by a store, we are sure that the information we use when purchasing a product or the information we share on social networks is recorded. There are strict regulations or rules regarding how companies can use this information; but the truth is that customers have no real control over this and cannot guarantee proper use. This situation also has an impact on business life. Thanks to technology, business owners can reach their employees 24/7. This allows for special legislative intervention. Businesses can use social media to communicate with their employees, and they can use networks to enable employees to perform certain tasks. There are therefore risks to privacy if the use of modern technology is not regulated or if certain ethical measures are not followed.are not. taken. It is clear that certain arrangements and understandings between employees and employers should be proposed for better communication and for ethical reasons involved in the process. The articulations of using modern technology in a workplace should be better understood and implemented more effectively. This case study will attempt to explain when the technological context in an organization can be problematic, and to what extent communication in a business, particularly between employees. and the employer, can be key to the risk management process.Case One: Use of TechnologyThis case concerns a student named Miranda Rusden who works at a university. Miranda has been working for four years and did not expect a job promotion. She fulfilled her duty and evaluated the free time allotted to her. She performed tasks such as checking emails and communicating with people. Miranda grabbed and naturally grabbed without paying attention to her private life, so she hardly paid attention to the fact that she had a lot of free time outside of work. But when his manager received a report on how much time off he was taking and how much time was spent on personal activities, things took on another dimension. This situation had to be brought under control somehow. Although employees were aware of the time they spent on personal activities during work hours, this also came at a cost. The result was low productivity. Businesses can save a lot of money if employees, as a business, reduce the time spent on personal activities during work hours. For this reason, companies must apply and respect certain rules with regard to their employees. Second case: distinction between public space and private lifeGiven the importance of social media in people's lives, companies can use this fact to obtain certain advantages. Social networks can be used as a means of communication between company employees. As an individual and as a company, the use of these channels can become broader and more open. As a result, any personal or company-specific information becomes public and a shared post or controversial comment may be unethical. There must therefore be a boundary between private life and public life, and individuals must be made aware of this issue. We must respect confidentiality rules, be careful about the type of information and data that will be shared with the channels and make a point of doing so. This is especially important when it comes to sexuality, family relationships, religious beliefs and other important aspects of life. It is up to an employer to ensure that these expectations, policies and practices are well expressed. A clear line of demarcation must be drawn between the private and public lives of its employees. It is important to ensure that there is no conflict of interest and that organizational staff should be constantly reminded and informed that any information posted on the Internet is made public. Third case: Legitimacy of technological surveillanceSurveillance is appropriate as long as it is carried out appropriately and responsibly. Over the past few decades, the use of cameras has increased significantly. Cameras are found almost everywhere and they are clearly installed for the benefit of employers. Ordinary workers can also benefit from this technology. Cameras are particularly used in the event of an accident, conflict, theft, etc. They are, 27(3), 327-339.