There is no easy answer to the question of religious freedoms versus civil laws. This debate dates back to Greek times, when Sophocles wrote Antigone. This Greek play explored the conflict but ultimately gave no definitive answer as to who was right. However, over time the answer has become clearer and clearer. Civil law should take precedence over religious law because of its consistent and impartial protection for the majority of the population. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Civil laws were created to keep people safe and government stable, so religion should not interfere with that. In Antigone, Creon's actions were all in the best interest of the state. When Creon addressed the Chorus, he said: “No one values ​​friendship more than I; but we must remember that friends made at the risk of destroying our ship are not friends at all” (Episode 1, lines 158-159). Creon's main concern is the state, so he will not let anything stop him from fulfilling his duty. Additionally, when Antigone breaks the law, Creon gives her no special treatment simply because they are related. When Creon learned that Antigone was guilty, he said: “Who is this man, she or I, if this crime goes unpunished? » (Episode 2, lines 382-383). In order to protect the state, Creon cannot treat his loved ones differently. Antigone tried to convince Creon that she only did it for the gods and that "honors are due to all the dead" (episode 2, line 413), but Creon's judgment remained firm. Even though Antigone had good intentions, Creon had to punish her to maintain the stability of the state. The law is designed from the start with people's safety in mind, so it cannot make exceptions, otherwise dangers may arise. Religious freedoms are used as an excuse to break the law, discriminate against others, and not do your job. Kim Davis is an example of people who commit actions like this because she used religion to not do her job while discriminating against others. In “Draw the Line Between Civil and Religious Rights” by Linda Greenhouse, many personalities gave their opinions on the actions of Kim Davis. For example, presidential candidate Donald Trump said, “Whether you like the decision or not, you have to follow the Supreme Court” (Greenhouse). This quote shows that even if you agree with a law, you still have to follow it. Additionally, Gov. John Kasich of Ohio said, “I respect that this lady disagrees, but she is also a government employee. She does not lead a church” (Serre). This means that Kim Davis has the right to express her opinion, not the right to not do her job. Finally, Michael Gerson wrote in the Washington Post: "There is no serious argument for the right of public officials to break laws they disagree with, even for religious reasons" (Greenhouse ). Because Kim Davis occupies the position of a public official, by not doing her job, she is breaking the law. Although Kim Davis is a more extreme example, that doesn't change the fact that you shouldn't use religion as a reason to break the law. Even though civil laws are consistent and absolute, religious laws vary and therefore do not constitute a good standard for founding a society. on. For example, interpretations of religious laws between different religions. In “Religious morality versus civil law: religious conflicts..