One of the top trending topics when voting for a presidential candidate or state representative is health care. Everyone wants to know the candidates' plans to keep the average American healthy and worry-free when it comes to their medical plans. People are turning to health care to function as normally as possible. So why is healthcare important? This essay argues that health care is important because it can help repair something that is essentially "broken" within you, whether it be physical, emotional, mental, internal, or external. Health care is looked to as a way to support you when times are tough, especially when you are poor or close to being poor. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original Essay When it comes to health care, there are different theories of justice that may agree or disagree with the topic of free health insurance for all. The differences between libertarian, utilitarian, and egalitarian theories come from their view of what is right. When we talk about what is right, we return to what Lewis Vaughn said in chapter 1: “Justice in the most general sense refers to people getting what is right or what is owed to them. » When we talk about health care, we turn to another type of justice called distributive justice which, according to Vaughn, is "justice concerning the fair distribution of society's advantages and disadvantages, or benefits and burdens, including income, poverty, employment, rights, taxes and public service. “There are two main theories of justice that view the health care dilemma from two opposite sides of the spectrum. I will first discuss libertarian theories of justice, which in summary say that the burden of a society should lie in the role of a government "that protects the rights of individuals to freely pursue their own interests in the economic marketplace without violation of their rights. freedom through coercion, manipulation or fraud. This means that libertarians do not lean toward the idea of ​​free health care because it would take away some of their freedom, these people prefer their freedom as a whole. They believe that the government has no obligation “to adjust the distribution of benefits and burdens between people”. According to Vaughn, these people believe that the distribution of health care should be the responsibility of “free and autonomous individuals.” In this sense, Vaughn shares that “no one has a right to health care and a government program using taxpayer dollars to provide universal health care.” or even health care reserved for low-income families would be unfair. From a liberal perspective, programs like health for all would be considered a "violation" of people's rights to use their resources as they see fit. They believe that if the government provided free health care to all New Yorkers and Americans, it would be acting unfairly. I do not agree with this theory and lean more towards egalitarian theories of justice. Norman Daniel mentions that libertarians might see this as a "bottomless pit" and that's because they see it as an ever-expanding range of medical needs. This means that protecting such a costly right to health care would ensure that their rights to liberty and property are not violated. Egalitarian theories of?