Table of ContentsIntroductionPerspectivesConclusionIntroductionGender stereotypes are as strong today as they were 30 years ago! What is the cause of this? The problem of women's rights in different countries is the increasing oppression of women in less economically developed countries. This is a global problem because countries with more developed economies provide more opportunities for women. Women who live in countries with more accessible education and the ability to hold power in government are oppressed by the men in power. In order to address the issue of women's oppression in less economically developed countries, it is important to examine different perspectives, which is the focus of this essay "Women's Rights are Human Rights" which will explore the growth rights, cultural influences, and laws that allow or deny women's rights in countries like the United States, North Korea, and Pakistan. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original EssayAn important key term to know is judicial, as it is a major topic that women can participate in in different countries. Another important keyword or key term to know is education as it is a major topic and one that women can participate in in different countries. Another important keyword is non-compliance, as it explains why different countries are further behind in evolving their women's rights laws. Perspectives From the first source, it is clear that the argument is that the Education plays a major role in women's rights. The author of the first article written for UN Women. This is a credible source because UN Women is a national news outlet that investigates different issues related to women around the world. This is also a government website, so it must be credible. The thesis of this source is that education equals economic empowerment. In the source, this gives the idea that “In 40% of economies, women's early-stage entrepreneurial activity is half or less than half that of men. » (UN Women, 2018). Its main points are that increasing access to education for women and girls contributes to women's economic empowerment and more inclusive economic power. The thesis of this source is that education equals economic empowerment. Its main points are that increasing access to education for women and girls contributes to women's economic empowerment and more inclusive economic growth. This assertion and main point is supported by economic growth in OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries. The importance of this argument lies in the possibility of a partial solution to the problem of women's rights and opportunity oppression in underdeveloped countries. The strength of the argument is that it gives many examples in the reasoning behind the claim. He also gives and refutes the counterargument. Their weaknesses, however, are that they do not give examples of underdeveloped countries that have increased women's rights through access to education. The strengths are the numerical evidence to support their claim. The weaknesses of their argument are that there is no concrete evidence that this increase in education will be successful. The aspect of this source that increases credibility is that it comes from a government source that has statistics from around the world, as it comes from the UN whichare the United Nations of the world. This source is credible because there are specific sets of data that can be backed up. The impact of strengths and weaknesses credibility is that if the strengths outweigh the weaknesses, it is more likely that the solution presented will be examined and proven as a possible solution. Capacity factors impact the sources argument because they have more determining abilities to persuade a reader of the possible benefits that education would have on developing countries, and the opportunities it would provide to young women and children . The other view is that education cannot improve women's opportunities because it is a cultural and religious issue. The author of this source claims that no amount of education will lead to an equal society because the culture and religion found in developing countries like the Middle East have specific moral beliefs that place men above women. This source is credible because it gives examples and statistics on Middle Eastern cultural and religious beliefs in their views on women's rights in government and the Church. The author also gives credible references to studies done to show that there are multiple perspectives that support his argument. The strengths of his argument or his ability to give examples from Middle Eastern countries and concrete documents that show their point of view on women's rights. It also gives examples of the increasing access to education for women and the continued oppression of women in positions of political and religious leadership. The weaknesses of his argument are that he does not take into consideration other points of view on his assertion, such as that on a land we need, more educated, they would be able to work and develop the economy in these developing countries. The first view asserts that increased availability of education and higher education for women will enable economic growth in both developing and developed countries. The second perspective states that no level of education available to women will lessen their oppression due to the cultural and religious beliefs implemented in these countries. States that no level of education available to women will lessen their oppression due to the cultural and religious beliefs implemented in these countries (especially the Middle East). However, they both emphasize how little has changed in the oppression of women in developing countries, although they see different ways of approaching the problem. The third point of view is that of the United States. He compares women's rights from the early 20th century to those of the 21st century. The author of the article is specifically interested in the causes of the decrease in oppression of women in the United States. The decrease in rates of oppression was primarily due to laws put in place to allow women to vote and social changes that allowed women to receive education equal to men and be allowed to hold jobs previously dominated by men. The source is credible because it comes from The New York Times, a major news outlet, which requires factual information that can be proven and/or supported. This source is credible because it gives specific laws passed in the United States that grant rights to women. The strength of this argument is that there are many facts and numerical data that support the argument that women have increased their rights through government laws and access to education. The weakness of this argument is that the author does not compare.