Table of ContentsOverviewDiscussionConclusionReferencesIn this essay, I will write about the dilemmas that three companies faced. And let's give an analysis, look at the moral values ​​of the leaders through these events, and talk about human nature. Is unethical a violation of the rules? This is indeed a problem that makes many people feel contradictory. Say no to plagiarism. Get Custom Essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get Original EssayOverviewIn Baike, Baidu.com, business ethics refers to the application of accepted ethics to specific business scenarios and activities. Business ethics begins with analyzing the nature of business and the first behaviors of business activities and provides people with codes of business ethics that determine whether business activities conform to ethical standards. Moral behavior means morally significant activities towards others and society that occur under the control of a certain moral conscience. It is the concrete outward manifestation of human moral knowledge, a means of achieving moral motivation, and it opposes “immoral behavior.” Including two categories of moral behavior and immoral behavior. Different ages, nations, societies, and classes have different standards for these two types of behavior. Generally, moral behavior is behavior that benefits others and society and vice versa. I read a newspaper with the title Why should humans be moral? This article gave me new inspirations about ethics, and I think it is closely related to business ethics. Human beings have greed and desire. Running a business is linked to acquiring advantages. Human nature and its dark side will be revealed. I believe that the existence of business ethics has two forms. First, morality is just a tool and it is not worth pursuing. Second, people obey it. Morality is simply about avoiding punishment. If immorality is to one's advantage, anyone will violate it. Discussion There is also an ethical dilemma in the field of education that I have come into contact with, and it is certain. I am very interested in this, I searched the relevant documents on Wikipedia and got some conclusions. Ethical dilemma, also known as moral paradox, refers to a situation in which there is an obvious conflict between several moral orders, and if one of them is observed, the other will be violated. Either way, actions may conflict with your values ​​and morals. The tram problem is better known. The formalization of the ethical dilemma is as follows: A is a moral necessity. B is also a moral necessity. However, I can't do A and B at the same time. The company I work for is a large tuition chain. It started its development in 1998 and opened more than 200 branches in 2018 and expanded to Indonesia and Singapore. It is the first place in the educational community of Malaysia. But in 2019 this year, the company was involved in large-scale fraud cases. Over the years, the company has recruited mediocre but good graduates so that these employees can get job opportunities and study in foreign universities, but the so-called foreign universities are fake. The diplomas are also fake. Part of the monthly salary paid for tuition is put into the pockets of the group management, and inexperienced teachers are hired toteach so that these newly graduated children will be deceived. This is a big scandal in the field of education. Nearly 2,000 victims have been unable to receive compensation and there is nothing left. After the incident, the media and the victims only attacked the chairman of the group, and the relevant management was not involved and did not regret it.In response to this matter, as a victim, I would like to analyze this matter from an objective point of view.After the incident, should the president, as a leader, take full responsibility?What do you think of this matter?The victims did not investigate the origin of the diploma and discovered that it was a scam. Should they be paid? First, the leader is the image and main character of the entire company. When things happened, business people did not dare to face the media and the public because they made moral mistakes and chose to run away. In the end, the leader still has to bear most of the responsibility, because many decisions are made by the leader, and the rest of the party must also courageously admit their mistakes.Second, the occurrence of this incident forces people to believe that people are full of selfish desires and that morality is just a nice cloak. The image created by this president is low-key, intelligent and mature, which makes many employees angry and disappointing. We must therefore be very vigilant in this society. Some people like to use the masks of good people to disguise themselves and make people believe them because they know human nature too well. I like to study the weaknesses of human nature and the reaction to things. Third, the degree is personal and the future is personal. As a student of the authenticity of the degree, we should have the responsibility to investigate and make a choice. Many paths are chosen by individuals. If we are wrong, we also need to reflect on ourselves and learn from our mistakes. Compensation is needed, and victims are also a group eager to learn, so they will choose to work part-time to reduce their burden. However, compensation is expected to be difficult to obtain.Let's look at the following case.In 1989, a huge oil tanker named Exxon Valdez suffered a serious oil spill in the Brooks William Sea, USA, and the sea water been seriously polluted. This is a disastrous blow for the residents. This ship is the newest and most advanced in the fleet. But due to the large and bulky hull, it took a minute for the oil-laden ship to react to course changes. After the ship left port, the tanker radioed the Coast Guard for a transshipment to prevent ice from floating in the ship's departure channel. With permission, Valdez changed course. A few minutes later, the Coast Guard lost contact with the tanker's radar. Valdez struck a reef in Williams Gulf. At that time, the captain remained in the cabin. After the accident, Exxon's attitude towards this serious accident has been inconsistent: at first, they reacted strongly and expressed concern; then they quickly shied away from their responsibilities and, finally, they reluctantly took on the work of eliminating oil pollution. But that attitude left Exxon unable to restore the company's image after paying huge cleanup costs of up to $2.5 billion. Leave a reputation for indifference towards the environment. In combination with this case, how do you think companies should handle environmental protection issues? If you are an advisor to the chairman of Exxon, howwould you advise on the crisis? When the accident happened, did it mean that the organization did something unethical? First, environmental issues have become a matter of concern for everyone. As environmental problems worsen, the public is increasingly inclined to protect the environment. This puts more pressure on companies to take environmental issues more seriously. Environmental problems force companies to change their production technologies and reduce environmental interference and pollution during production, consumption and transportation. Exxon executives may think that this is just the death of a few seabirds, and that there is no need to make a fuss until there are any injuries. The company's repeated delays and excuses not only failed to gain public understanding, but were blamed and damaged the company's image. Second, the harshest criticism leveled at Exxon has been its indifferent attitude. If the president of the company can quickly arrive at the scene of the accident and shows great concern about the development of the situation, this is more effective than company advertising. Even if the pollution accident is serious, it also means that the opportunity to improve the company's reputation and establish a corporate relations environment is here. It is necessary to abandon short-term interests, sincerely rescue the crisis, and maintain an open and frank attitude, otherwise the company will be plunged into a crisis of reputation destruction.Third, after the accident, it caused harm to society, and No matter how serious the crime, it is morally difficult to blame. The situation in Valdez is more complicated and there are many areas of default. If preventive training is provided in advance and the facilities on board are inspected, each member will have a sense of responsibility and the oil spill may not occur. Even if this happens, it will be controlled effectively and the environmental pollution will not be so serious. Exxon is the most responsible organization... Let's look at the last case. In the spring of 1994, at a public hospital in Harlingen, in the north of the Netherlands, the director discovered that hospital staff had leaked patients' donations. Only a few dozen guilders are stolen each week. However, the dean also attached great importance to it. These donations are intended to reward hospital caregivers during Christmas. The hospital discreetly installed video surveillance while police contacted him. At first, the hospital decided that no matter who the thief was, he would be expelled as soon as he was found. Then the truth became clear: the thief was the hospital's only neurologist. The hospital board was surprised because if the neurologist was fired, it would mean the hospital's neurology clinic would be closed, 20 employees would be unemployed for a long time and patients would have to go to in a rival hospital 25 kilometers away to see a doctor. The council discussed at length and eventually left the doctor. The hospital explained to the public that it knew the dangers of leaving such a person, but the hospital insisted that the doctor's retention was for strategic reasons and that, although it had serious moral consequences, everything was dominated by the strategic interests of the hospital. would you evaluate the decisions made by the hospital board of directors? What would you do if you were a member of the board of directors? What do you think about popularity..