-
Essay / Discussion of whether criminal profiling is still relevant
Criminal profiling is a strategy used by police and investigators in criminal cases such as rape, murder and kidnapping. However, since the late 1990s, criminal profiling has been extended to other criminal cases such as arson, terrorism and burglary. Most people understand criminal profiling from popular TV shows CSI, Coldcase SVU, Bones and Mindhunters, etc. All these TV shows are awesome, captivating and exciting and make viewers feel like a detective. Although watching these shows and seeing how they manage to solve all the different cases with very little to no evidence is fantastic, but have you ever stood back and thought: if criminal profiling is so great, then why is there- Are there so many unsolved cases in the world? And is criminal profiling still relevant? It turns out that every police department in the world uses the same 7-step strategy: say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Obtain the original essayStep 1 - Gather all evidence identified from the scene, the victim, the suspect and other sources.Step 2 - All information collected is then evaluated.Step 3 - The suspect is then classified into an “organized offender” or “disorganized offender” category, there is a third category which is “mixed offender” when the suspect cannot be classified in the other two categories. Step 4 – Reconstruction of the crime. The crime situation is developed from the beginning wherever possible. Step 5 – Profiling potential suspects. Step 6 – Statements and alibis are collected from suspects. Step 7 (Final Step) – After appearing in court with all the found evidence presented, the criminal is then convicted and sent to prison. The steps seem to cover the cases from start to finish and don't seem too complicated. This strategy has undergone very little change since its implementation in 1973. If criminal profiling was so flawed, drastic changes would have been implemented, such that it resembles "if it ain't broke, then , don't fix it." On the other hand, there was a study in which the police evaluated 192 profiles established by the FBI, 17% helped identify suspects, 83% of police officers. found the profiles helpful even though the profiles only helped solve 14% of cases, or a total of 5 arrests out of 184 cases, giving a success rate of 2.7%. Not great. results for criminal profiling in this study How about another study called “Coals to Newcastle, Part 1, study of offenders” by Gary Copson As part of this experiment they took two police stations fully. operational staff and trained one in the use of a new statistical approach to criminal profiling which had to be strictly respected. The other police station was left alone and continued to use the usual standard approach to criminal profiling. Ultimately, the results showed that the station using the new statistical approach had a 260% increase in solved crimes compared to the station using the standard approach. The standard criminal profiling described is known as the “traditional” criminal profiling technique. However, it would appear that there is still much work to be done to examine the reliability and validation of criminal profiling. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized item now from..