In the film titled "Stanford Prison Experiment", the experiment was intended to study the psychological effects of prison life, and students played the roles of guards and prisoners. Zimbardo structured the experience to make everything seem as realistic as possible. The students chosen as prisoners and guards were selected from 70 applicants who responded to Zimbardo's advertisement for test subjects. Individuals with psychological problems, disabilities, history, and history of drug use were excluded. Only 24 respondents met his criteria to participate in the experiment. All were men from the same socioeconomic middle class, and each received $15 per day for their participation. A drawing of lots decided which volunteers would be imprisoned and which would be guards. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Prisoner 416, the student who had been in solitary confinement, released this short, chilling statement. “I don't consider this an experiment or a simulation, because it was a prison run by psychologists and not the state. I started to feel this identity, the person I was who decided to go to prison was being distanced from me. I was 416. I was really my number", in this line I can say that even though there are some prisoners who already adapt the role of prisoner, there are still people who still know each other and know their identify. .Social influence and group conformity can also be seen in the film. Although the purpose of the experiment was to examine captivity, its results were used to demonstrate the impressionability and obedience of people when provided with a legitimizing ideology and social and institutional support. This experiment began with the best scientific intentions, to discover whether the personality traits of prisoners and guards affected their lives in prison, but went awry after the participants lost their identities and immersed themselves in the roles assigned to them. entrusted. the film is very interesting and it really caught my attention. Crudup plays Zimbardo as an overzealous researcher pushing his limits, trying to create a very specific outcome among the students he observes. The filmmakers even emphasize the fragility of the experimental device, by inserting characters who emphasize that Zimbardo is not a disinterested observer. This film suggests that our behavior largely conforms to our preconceived expectations. All things being equal, we act the way we think we're supposed to act, especially if that expectation comes from the person above. We can also see that in Stanford's setup, this means we have to behave stereotypically like a tough guard, and we strive to fulfill that role. Tell us that we must not give up hope for social mobility and we act accordingly. The film is impressive considering its scope, historical legacy, and overall package for an independent film. Unlike many historical films, many people have at least seen some authentic footage, which adds a certain standard to meet. The film captures the look of this original corridor and cells, and the majority of the cast finds it both realistic and period-appropriate. And given the restrictions of filming in so few locations and most taking place in narrow hallways, the visual variety they were able to create on camera is to be applauded. I was particularly, 151, 109505.