Positive ActionIn the early 1960s, the concept of affirmative action was introduced. Affirmative action was established to provide opportunities to the minority, without regard to an individual's color, race, sex, religion, or national origin. Through affirmative action, categories of people who may have been excluded from certain rights in the past would now be offered opportunities such as employment, housing and education. Racism created the inequality that made it necessary to enact affirmative action laws. Allowing for a diverse community of individuals, affirmative action requires jobs and even schools to hire and accept students based on their quota. This policy remains a matter of controversy as the Supreme Court still upholds issues in Michigan today. Say no to plagiarism. Get a Custom Essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get an Original EssayBefore taking positive action, it is not difficult to remember the days when it was said that “separate but equal” was constitutional. Plessy v. Ferguson upheld the constitutional right to segregation in public facilities, including schools, but under the “separate but equal” doctrine. This doctrine was ultimately discarded when the Supreme Court declared it unconstitutional after Brown v. The Board of Education. Following the Brown v. The Board of Education, schools were no longer allowed to be segregated because "separate but equal" taught students nothing but that separation is NOT equal. Decades later, affirmative action was implemented under the Equal Protection Clause, ensuring that everyone has equal opportunity. However, recently, Michigan voters have been hesitant about requiring Michigan's public universities to use affirmative action and want to ban the idea that everyone has equal opportunity. Michigan voters are voting against affirmative action in Michigan and don't want public universities to consider it. a person's race, gender or nationality. In 2006, a proposal to allow "all gender and race-based preferences in public education, public employment, and public procurement" was supported. However, the Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action was presented. This case debated whether allowing admission to public universities to prohibit discrimination and treatment based on sex, race, and national origin violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth amendment. In 2012, this action was ruled unconstitutional by the court of appeal because it was discriminatory and unfair. What others fear is that Michigan universities will become segregated because of their admissions policies. Since universities, including public universities in Michigan, emphasize the idea of ​​a diverse population, without requiring affirmative action, it is quite possible that the population is not as diverse. This is a possibility because not all people of different races or national origins are equally intelligent. Although the appeals court's 2012 decision found Michigan's race-conscious admissions policy unconstitutional, the Supreme Court overturned its decision in April 2014. This does not guarantee diversity at public universities. It was even found that when the proposal was first implemented, the percentage of black and Hispanic students in.