Although some states do not practice executions by death, the penalty has remained contralateral. Different people have different options regarding the death penalty. There are those who agree while others oppose it. Investigations carried out to demonstrate or disapprove of death penalty cases offer different options: some believe that death sentences are a positive path to justice while others consider the death penalty as an uncivilized way of punishing cases of death. murder. Since the death penalty is a controversial topic among many people, this is half rumor and half study because no one knows who is right or wrong regarding the death penalty debate. These research papers present analyzes of the pros and cons of the death penalty, as most Americans recognize them. The paper will exploit the fact that the death penalty is just a belief and thought of most of the people who contributed to it and determine who is right or wrong, which is a question for many. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”? Get an original essay To understand the reason why most people have different views on the case for the death penalty, in this article , a brief history of the subject will be key. In most countries around the world, there were many methods of carrying out the death penalty. People who break laws or morals can be punished in different ways, depending on what is expected of them. Most commonly used traditional means of sentencing included poisoning, strangulation, suffocation, stoning, starvation, cooking in hot oil, burial alive, and in the recent past , the introduction of electrocution either through the use of chamber gases or through toxic substances. injections. These methods were fortunately cruel and not widely known to mainstream Americans and most death sentences were adopted in the United Kingdom in Europe. Most of the time, most of these executions took place publicly, where mostly drunk men would gather and watch the executions. All crimes against States, persons, property or public harmony in English laws were therefore punishable by death. These crimes are all enshrined in America's current constitution. In the early 18th century, theft of small sums remained a petty crime throughout the 19th century in Britain. The United States Constitution prohibits unusual punishment under the Bill of Rights Amendment. Although the issue of the death penalty remained a frequently debated topic by many, it is perhaps not surprising that in the mid-19th century there were campaigns to eliminate capital punishment. In 1846, the state of Rhode Island and Michigan abolished the death penalty (Reggio 2014). However, while most states have banned the death penalty, some have implemented new forms of execution for condemned prisoners. Over time, most campaigns against the death penalty slowed down, as some states like Arizona and Washington reinstated the death penalty between 1917 and 1955. These events saw the execution of Gee Jon, a murderer during of the Tong War. Electric and hanging chairs were now becoming common forms of executions (Regigio 2014).Bibliographical annotation. In an essay by (Carmical & Casey, 2011), the authors argue that the death penalty is acceptable and that the determination of morality is either right or wrong. It was therefore legitimate.