Table of ContentsIntroductionApple vs. FBIConclusionIntroductionIn today's society, technology has become one of the most used and sought-after events of the millennium . This essay on the Apple v. FBI controversy focuses on whether Apple should be forced to create new software that would allow the FBI to access data from locked iPhones, and I argue that Apple should not do so. comply due to concerns about personal information, setting a dangerous precedent. and potential damage to their reputation. Say no to plagiarism. Get a custom essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essay Apple vs FBI Although the FBI is cooperating with Apple to investigate a domestic terrorist attack, I argue that Apple should not cooperate with the FBI for personal reasons. user information/trust, a dangerous precedent and harm their international reputation. Apple argues that the court cannot force the company to speak, especially when the speech would be contrary to Apple's interests. Customers want their personal information to be secure so that others cannot access it without authorization. Apple accesses personal and confidential data to defend customers stored on its devices. Value of personal data and what people think about it Indeed, personal information is important to everyone. Giving authority the power to invade our privacy creates an easy way for them to violate their power and deprive citizens of their constitutional rights. The invention of the new operating system will also set a dangerous precedent for future companies that will negatively influence everyone. . Apple firmly believes that creating this necessary backdoor system will create a chain of risky effects that will affect everyone from smartphone users to social media companies and their privacy. Apple, a famous billionaire company, has successfully protected its customers' information. In “Forcing Apple to Hack This iPhone Sets a Dangerous Precedent,” Darrell Issa oversees statistics and past evidence to effectively convince his audience of governors that they should believe whether or not Apple should force hack it because it could potentially bring people into a dangerous situation. situation and neglect the objective of protecting people's privacy. Ultimately, Apple could have lost customers due to its reputation by changing the protection of its cellular products. If Apple had chosen to create software for this particular problem, there would be no restrictions on the government's invasion of data. The topic has already been raised that creating software that allows access to a locked device could potentially allow hackers to attack many other people's devices. I agree that Apple should not create new software to unlock the phone, because once the lock is built, there are no limits on who or how the coding can be applied. Although Apple products ended up looking less secure, the result improves Apple's reputation as a privacy advocate and its assertion that strong encryption does not constitute a security detriment. Ultimately, it's rare that information on cell phones is totally and completely inaccessible. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a trial.