The Faculty of Science adheres to the university's policy on academic dishonesty, which constitutes misconduct and is dealt with under University Statute 17 ( http://calendar.publishing.uwa.edu.au/last/partc/stat17).Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay These guidelines refer to the following: Cheating on tests or exams, for example, copying from another student, or incorporating unauthorized materials into the test or exam room. Plagiarism, that is, presenting the work of another as if it were one's own, for example by quoting or paraphrasing someone else's opinions, arguments or research results, whether published or not (for example, from a book or article, website or other student assignment), without clear acknowledgment of the source. You may cite material from another source, but if you do so, the citation must be perfect and, in addition to citing the source reference in the usual way, the beginning and end of the quotation must be clearly indicated by quotation marks. For example, “citation” Falsification of the results of experiments or research studies. Collusion, such as writing an assignment jointly and submitting it as the work of a single individual. Although discussion and cooperation are valuable in the pursuit of knowledge and understanding, any work submitted for assessment must be the individual's own work, unless it is clearly designated as a work project. band. Helping someone else commit a dishonest act such as those listed above. The consequences of misconduct can be serious, including exclusion from university. All students should be aware of the definitions and policies relating to academic misconduct (http://www.teachingandlearning.uwa.edu.au/staff/policies/conduct), as well as any additional requirements or stipulations that may be provided by individual unit coordinators.SummaryThe correlational relationship between language and communication was investigated and examined in this study. 644 PSYC1102 students from the University of Western Australia took part in two computer-based tasks testing their language and communication abilities. The first task was a word relation exercise and the second task was a tangram description and identification exercise. The correlations found between language and communication ability, and communication ability and interpretation accuracy, were found to be statistically significant. The literature on the topic is reviewed and suggestions for further research are discussed, for example the need for a more diverse sample. Do people need language to communicate? The Oxford English Dictionary (2018) defines language as the method of written or spoken human communication, consisting of formed and established words. Language includes a range of aspects including sounds, grammar rules, symbols and speech. Communication is defined by the Oxford English Dictionary (2018) as the exchange of information through various media and categories. Language and communication are key aspects of human behavior and it is therefore theorized that language is essential to communication, as this relationship influences the transmission of information from one individual to another. Other studies have been carried out on the interpretation of the relationship between language and communication, highlighting the importance of the relationship between language and communication, particularly how this relationship developsin childhood. Bishop and Adams (1991) examined the association between the language and communication abilities of 54 children with specific language impairment (SLI) compared to a control group of children considered able to speak. Participants completed a description task in which children described visual stimuli to a listener. The experimenters found no relationship between communication skills and conversational ability. The Journal of Experimental Child Psychology (2018) published a study led by Yamashiro and Vouloumanos in which they analyzed the relationship between communication and language between infants and adults. They conducted an experiment that examined the ways in which one-year-old infants without spoken language ability communicated. The study examined the eye movements of infants and adults when they saw a subject communicating with a series of objects around them. If the subject was unable to contact the object, they would use vocabulary or sounds with a second subject who would communicate with the object. They found that infants and adults were attracted to spoken language rather than sounds. Ricks and Wing's (1975) study analyzed language characteristics and communication patterns in autistic versus neurotypical children through a series of describing and listening activities. They found that language abnormalities can be detected in early childhood and that children with autism can therefore be diagnosed relatively early. Our experiment was accompanied by two objectives. The first goal was to test whether individuals with higher language skills are more effective communicators. The second goal was to test whether people with higher language skills are more effective interpreters. There were two hypotheses. It was hypothesized that there would be a positive correlation between the linguistic ability of the producer and the effectiveness of communication, and it was hypothesized that there would be a positive correlation between the linguistic ability of the receiver and accuracy of interpretation. Method Participants Participants were 644 PSYC1102 students from the University of Western Australia. . 403 were female, 240 were male, and 1 was listed as other. The age of the participants ranged between 15 and 55 years, the average age was 21:30 and the standard deviation was 6:30. Participation was part of the course requirements; however, participation was voluntary. Materials Comprehensive Spoken Language Assessment, 2nd Edition (CASL-2). Constructed by Rehfeld and Padgett in 2018, this computer task tested participants' language abilities. The task included four test categories with 128 items in total. The four categories were the lexical/semantic category; synonym subscale with 35 items, synaptic category; grammatical morphemes subscale with 29 items, supralinguistic category; non-literal language subscale with 29 items and pragmatic category; Pragmatic Language subscale with 32 items.Keep in mind: This is just a sample.Get a custom paper now from our expert writers.Get a custom essayNon-interactive communication task. The tangram game developed by Rogers, Fay and Maybery in 2013 was used for this activity which consisted of two tasks, a receiver and a producer task. The producers were given a tangram, an abstract geometric form, where they described the shape. Recipients would read the description and try to identify the shape. Procedure Participants first completed the full spoken language assessment. All the