-
Essay / Deer vs. Wade should not be challenged
99. This number refers to the regulatory number of years a murderer in Alabama spends in prison. Under recent legislation, that's also the number of years a doctor performing an abortion can get. Many have questioned such strict legislation, asking questions such as these: How can lawmakers equate abortion providers with rapists? Abortion has been a controversial and much-debated topic since Ronald Reagan's presidential campaign; it is the act of terminating a human pregnancy within the first 28 weeks after conception. Anti-abortion activists have tried for years to ban the procedure through various methods; Even if some of their reasoning is understandable, it is strongly argued. Abortion is considered on the one hand as an end of life and on the other as a human right. Recently, many states have changed their laws to criminalize abortion, and pro-life activists are making progress in banning abortion, with no exceptions for rape or incest. Roe vs. Wade has been the law on the books for 45 years, granting women safe and legal access to abortion; however, a number of states have recently passed laws in an effort to overturn this Supreme Court decision. This could have harmful consequences for women across the country; essentially violating their rights and risking their overall health physically by pursuing unsafe methods, and mentally by placing financial and emotional strain on mothers and their unwanted children. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay The debate over whether or not abortion should be legalized was first addressed in Roe Vs. Wade, a case that took place on January 22, 1973. It was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court, which upheld the legality of women's abortion under the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. Since 1973, this topic has been a major obstacle for women, and because of this difficult situation, anti-abortionists have resorted to extreme methods to restrict women's right to abortion. The May 15, 2019 Alabama legislative decision is the most definitive decision against Roe Vs. Wading; it promulgates a near-total ban on abortion and provides no exceptions for rape and incest. In recent years, countries around the world have begun changing their laws to allow wider and easier access to abortion – but not the United States. Take Alabama's most recent abortion law. Such a law completely contradicts Roe v. Wade and goes against the U.S. Constitution legally, morally, and fundamentally. Many would view Alabama's decision as inhumane, disregarding the decision and ruling of the United States Supreme Court, and essentially an encroachment on women's rights. Therefore, the United States should uphold the Roe Vs. Wade decision in order to help address and combat recent anti-abortion trends and sentiments. Overturning Roe v. Wade will have many consequences, the first being the violation of women's basic human right to decide what to do with their bodies. Every woman has the right to privacy and bodily autonomy, abortion is a personal choice: it must be practiced in a safe and controlled manner. These imposed far-right views on abortion place an undue burden on women's rights, restricting and negatively impacting their safety andlegal care. This debate is deeply tied to women's equal rights and empowerment as full citizens of the United States. Abortion supporters have for years chipped away at women's rights by reducing access to abortion, which is considered health care. According to Article 25 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, “Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and his family, including food, clothing, housing, medical care and necessary medical care. social services.' ("Universal Declaration of Human RightsRights") Nevertheless, the right to access safe and legal abortion should not be questioned, as this would infringe on women's rights and would not be constitutional. Delete Access to abortion, considered health care, impacts the physical and mental health of women and children Criminalizing and restricting abortion will encourage people to seek and submit to it. clandestine, unsafe and illegal abortions This would result in unsafe abortion methods that could cause serious risks to women's physical health, such as uterine perforations, hemorrhage, internal organ damage and death. indicates Human Rights Watch regarding women's rights, "Approximately 13% of maternal deaths in the world are attributable to abortion carried out in poor conditions, or between 68,000 and 78,000 deaths per year" Women's mental health. is seriously affected if they are forced to have unwanted babies. Parents who are forced to have children when they are not ready are not emotionally available to those children, creating unstable adults who feel out of place. Additionally, children born into families that are not ready to accommodate them can put the family in a difficult financial situation and lead them to live below poverty levels. Being financially unstable and not ready to have a child can cause parents to develop stress and anxiety, and can further cause them to resent the child (Foster). The example of a Midwestern woman who chose to abort six months after her first child illustrates how not being mentally stable and financially ready to support another baby can be a very difficult situation to deal with (Foster). Finally, many of these unwanted children are sent into the foster care system. In the United States, these children are at higher risks of mental and physical health problems such as asthma, depression and obesity. Banning abortion will lead to an influx of children into the foster care system, according to ChildTrends.org: “The number of children placed in foster care has increased in recent years, climbing to 443,000 in 2017 , compared to a recent historic low of 397,000 in 2012." That said, if abortions were to be banned, families and women would find themselves in even worse situations, with consequences on their physical and mental health and this would further complicate their life. Despite continued evidence and court rulings that the right to abortion must be respected, many still dispute it. Many critics of Roe v. Wade claim that the Supreme Court's decision is unfounded and has no legal basis. Some believe that Roe. Against. Wade was based on judicial activism, which therefore makes the case logically incoherent and constitutionally unprincipled. US constitutional lawyer Laurence Tribe had some thoughts on the legal matter; he mentioned: "One of the most.?