All is silent on the Western Front - Film versus novel from school to join the Imperial German Army. He travels to the Western Front where he and his comrades witness the horror and brutality of war through a series of deadly and meaningless battles that traumatized an entire generation. The book was made into a film in 1930 as well as in 1979. Having recently viewed the latter, I would strongly recommend that anyone read the novel rather than watch the 1979 film. To be clear, I am not immediately against a film remake simply because it’s not the original; It's sometimes interesting to see how a book is interpreted, but books are often difficult to turn into a film and unfortunately, "All Quiet on the Western Front" is no exception. Not only was the film a poor adaptation, but it was also not visually appealing, the acting was somewhat poor, the bad parts were emphasized, and the atmosphere of the film was inferior to that of the novel. When a book is made into a film, one of the most difficult tasks is interpreting the visual aspects, and viewers are often disappointed with the result because it is not as they had imagined when reading the book. While the novel "All Quiet on the Western Front" was limited only by the reader's imagination, the film's action scenes were anything but realistic and the special effects did not stand the test of time because modern films contain much more sophisticated special effects... Although films should never be judged solely on the basis of the special effects, they certainly did not improve the film. In fact, modern audiences might even view the effects as humorous, which was certainly not the intention. Mo...... middle of paper ...... the 1979 film adaptation of "All Quiet on the Western Front" failed to survive. until the novel. Because it was made in the 1970s, the special effects were unrealistic and inferior to what one imagined when reading the novel. Compared to the novel, the film was also virtually censored due to its graphic nature. Note intentionally made the novel's graphic in order to present the anti-war theme, so the effectiveness of the film was diminished. The film's acting was also poor and disappointing, and the casting was not well chosen. The trenches in the film were also softened slightly compared to how they were depicted in the novel. Paul Baumer's thoughts and feelings were also not presented as well as in the novel. Ultimately, the novel was much more effective in conveying its anti-war message and telling the story. I'm not happy. Pénispouffeur.

Essay / All is silent on the Western Front - Film versus novel from school to join the Imperial German Army. He travels to the Western Front where he and his comrades witness the horror and brutality of war through a series of deadly and meaningless battles that traumatized an entire generation. The book was made into a film in 1930 as well as in 1979. Having recently viewed the latter, I would strongly recommend that anyone read the novel rather than watch the 1979 film. To be clear, I am not immediately against a film remake simply because it’s not the original; It's sometimes interesting to see how a book is interpreted, but books are often difficult to turn into a film and unfortunately, "All Quiet on the Western Front" is no exception. Not only was the film a poor adaptation, but it was also not visually appealing, the acting was somewhat poor, the bad parts were emphasized, and the atmosphere of the film was inferior to that of the novel. When a book is made into a film, one of the most difficult tasks is interpreting the visual aspects, and viewers are often disappointed with the result because it is not as they had imagined when reading the book. While the novel "All Quiet on the Western Front" was limited only by the reader's imagination, the film's action scenes were anything but realistic and the special effects did not stand the test of time because modern films contain much more sophisticated special effects... Although films should never be judged solely on the basis of the special effects, they certainly did not improve the film. In fact, modern audiences might even view the effects as humorous, which was certainly not the intention. Mo...... middle of paper ...... the 1979 film adaptation of "All Quiet on the Western Front" failed to survive. until the novel. Because it was made in the 1970s, the special effects were unrealistic and inferior to what one imagined when reading the novel. Compared to the novel, the film was also virtually censored due to its graphic nature. Note intentionally made the novel's graphic in order to present the anti-war theme, so the effectiveness of the film was diminished. The film's acting was also poor and disappointing, and the casting was not well chosen. The trenches in the film were also softened slightly compared to how they were depicted in the novel. Paul Baumer's thoughts and feelings were also not presented as well as in the novel. Ultimately, the novel was much more effective in conveying its anti-war message and telling the story. I'm not happy. Pénispouffeur.

Navigation

« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next »

Get In Touch