Human rights have recently been firmly established as a universal and cross-cultural concept that affects the way operations are undertaken. Social credit, as a system introduced by the Chinese government, has certain impacts on these universal human rights. The system monitors and evaluates the behaviors of people and businesses and assigns them credit scores that define the extent to which they can be considered for social benefits in the country. By evaluating the behavior of citizens in their daily activities, the government intends to establish a problem-free society. The Chinese government clearly wants to create a reality in which bureaucratic pettiness can meaningfully manage people's rights. The theory of Confucianism proposes a way of life that emphasizes governmental and personal morality, sincerity and justice, and the correctness of social relations. Focusing on the concept of Confucianism, the social credit system developed by the Chinese government is not compatible with universal human rights. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”?Get an original essayWith emphasis on the theory of Confucianism, there must be an ethical and rational position that emphasizes value and the free will of human beings. Having a credit system that constantly monitors a person's efforts, wherever they are, prevents them from having a free private life and attempts to contrast with the fact that the right to privacy belongs to the right holder . When one person is granted certain rights, someone else is delegated a corresponding obligation. Therefore, in a rights relationship, there is the duty bearer and the rights holder. As long as the relationship between the duty holder and the right holder is considered fair, that right governs the relationship and the right holder exercises direct control over that relationship. Therefore, having a tracking system that automatically monitors all citizens without their consent amounts to neglecting the rights of citizens to the detriment of the duty bearer, namely the government. Universal human rights uphold equality, the right to personal security, liberty, freedom from slavery, freedom from discrimination, and freedom from state interference with all other rights of man, as observed in Asia. When the Chinese government established the social credit system, it raised ethical questions that make it incompatible with universal human rights. Although citizens are the rights holders, the system would result in discrimination against those who are unable to meet the standards of the system. For example, if a citizen does not wish to be part of this system or withdraws from it, then he will not be able to benefit from social credits in the system. Likewise, if a citizen scores low on social credits, then they will face difficult barriers to obtaining government-provided services, such as schools or even employment. Worse still, those with very poor credit will inevitably be prevented from accessing financial support from banks, traveling by higher means such as trains, or taking up government positions, among other obstacles. The system also leaves no room for error for citizens, which therefore requires zero errors; This is unlikely to be noticed in human beings. On the other hand, having social credits allowing you to follow each person.