Table of ContentsIntroductionMarc's ArgumentCarly's ArgumentSynthesis of Marc and Carly's ArgumentsConclusionIntroductionA synthesis essay is a type of academic writing that involves combining different points of view on a particular topic to form a coherent argument. This type of essay requires the author to analyze and evaluate multiple sources in order to come to an informed conclusion. The topic of this essay concerns the arguments made by Marc and Carly regarding a particular issue. This essay aims to synthesize their arguments and critically evaluate their claims. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Marc's Argument Marc's contention is that technology has had a detrimental effect on human communication. He claims that people have become too dependent on technology, such as social media and texting, and as a result, face-to-face communication has suffered. Marc supports his claim by citing studies that show that people who use social media excessively are more likely to feel isolated and depressed. He also argues that the ease of communication afforded by technology has led to a decline in the quality of communication. After evaluation, it appears that Marc's argument is well supported by evidence. The studies he cites suggest a correlation between social media use and a decline in mental health. However, it is important to consider the limitations of these studies, as they often rely on self-reports and may not be representative of the general population. Carly's Argument Carly's argument is that technology has improved communication by making it more accessible and more effective. She argues that social media and texting have made it easier for people to connect with others, especially those who are geographically distant. Carly supports her claim by citing examples of people who formed meaningful relationships online and were able to maintain them despite physical distance. Upon evaluation, it appears that Carly's argument is also well supported by evidence. The examples she cites suggest that technology has made it easier for people to connect with others. However, it is important to consider the limitations of these examples, as they may not be representative of the general population and may not capture the negative consequences of excessive technology use. Summary of Marc and Carly's argumentsThe synthesis of Marc and Carly's arguments clearly reveals that they are not mutually exclusive. While Marc argues that technology has had a negative impact on communication, Carly argues that it has had a positive impact. However, upon further analysis, it becomes clear that their arguments are not necessarily contradictory. Technology has undoubtedly made communication more accessible and effective, but it has also had negative consequences such as a decline in the quality of communication and feelings of isolation. Points of agreement between Marc and Carly's arguments include that technology has made communication more accessible and that this has had both positive and negative consequences. Points of disagreement include the overall impact of technology on communication, with Marc seeing it as more negative and Carly seeing it as more positive. The implications of this synthesis are complex. While it is clear that technology has had both positive and negative consequences on communication, it is not clear how these consequences can be balanced..