Table of ContentsIntroductionRelated ResearchConclusion IntroductionI will certainly never be able to put myself in the situation that people growing up in less developed countries find themselves in. get a feel for it by being there, meeting people and talking to them. - Bill Gates Bill Gates is one of the richest people in the world. The scale of wealth and generosity allowed him and his wife (Melinda Gates) to create a foundation focused on the poorest people in developing countries. Say no to plagiarism. Get a custom essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay The foundation's mission states: “Our Global Development Division works to help the world's poorest people to escape hunger and poverty. Our Global Health Division aims to harness advances in science and technology to save lives in developing countries. What drives the Gates Foundation and its mission is the language used to describe the geographies and issues the foundation focuses on. The use of the term development, as accompanied by words such as poverty and lack of science and technology, perhaps presupposes a capacity deficit. But is this the definition that Gates advocates when he uses the term development, or is it used as a platform to encourage new modes of advancing quality in capacity building? Related research In the approach to development, the term development is the opposite of developed; and this is determined by a standard of economic measurement called gross domestic product (GDP). GDP is a global development indicator used to measure the income of each nation. Thus, countries with higher GDP are considered developed and countries with lower incomes are considered developing. As the language of developed and development comes from the economic language of measurement, it also creates hierarchies, becoming the natural description of nations. Jacques Derrida identifies language as a supplement which presupposes the lack of something and also influences the notions of representation, reappropriation and the possibility of perversion. Perhaps the use of development as a permanent title for non-European nations is a struggle to maintain the industrial and materialistic development model of Western Europe or a continuation of a civilizational movement after the independence of the vis-a-vis states. - vis-à-vis colonial domination. is that it is a symbolic language which creates categorizations. This strengthens people to confirm a particular perception of thinking, reasoning and interpretation. Thus becoming a single idea that all stakeholders in “developing” states must rally around. This then creates a society subject to a specific form of representation and reappropriation, often supplemented by the "moving image of language or acting by the hand of another" (147). The objective of this article is to understand how the economic language of development and the developed has attempted and still attempts to create a globalized world based on similar fundamental values. Furthermore, when language reinforces a dominant perception that casts developing outsiders in need of renovation and development as insiders with all the expertise and knowledge needed for economic renovation, to what extent does this perception complement the historical account of colonialism and its consequences. obsession with civilization. When scientists “prove” atheory, it automatically becomes a fact or legal language. Proof of a theory does not make a concept or research a fact, but people develop "obvious" principles and procedures that convince others to believe and internalize the hypotheses as facts. Furthermore, the title scientist creates a general rule that exclusively grants certain "specialists" or "experts" the authority to prove theory as fact. The same metaphor applies to economic language which gives meaning to words which then become natural and factual. The danger with words like “development” or “third world” is that they are not socially constructed, but institutional and embedded in legal structures. The economic language of the terms “development” and “developed” is rooted in the foundations of the International Financial Institute. In partnership with the International Monetary Fund and the United Nations, the World Bank joined the two entities with the aim of financing long-term projects between two parties – “developed donors and developing borrowers”. Does this language mean anything to you? Because that’s the case for me! The term development presupposes deficiency and depicts a framework of powerlessness; it is also quite similar to the savage civilization narrative applied during colonialism. It is unfair and illegitimate. It is undemocratic because it speaks to individual experiences. For example, in my first political science class when I started college, the professor asked the students why they were interested in this class; three students responded by saying, “they want to go help people in developing countries.” The danger is not language itself, but the imaginary images it constructs in our thoughts. The economic language of developed and developing countries creates platforms that place nations and their people in hierarchies and has influenced the establishment of universal principles. Universal principles have been used as tools to regulate and promote order on a global scale. But who formulates the universal principles? how decisions are made; Are the universal principles really universal, does the categorization of nations produced by these principles reveal a new model of neocolonialism created to indirectly control the former “colonies”? The power of language can be unfair or just. It all depends on the approach used to justify the intention. Does the intention support the pluralism of the common interest or is it a claim for values? As the term developed implies a higher level and development implies progress, the words also communicate a dominant paradigm – a dominant paradigm that facilitates only Western values ​​in international politics and regulations. This is not to say that Western values ​​are illegitimate, but rather to highlight the value of all-party voices in politics and decision-making. Or as Iris Marion Young would say, legitimate democracy is one that facilitates inclusion without assimilation or acceptance of the differences and practices of other communities. Since the deliberate intention of economic language is to exclude, adding new normative forms of inclusion that make the unfamiliar familiar. Since global democracy is difficult to achieve due to the lack of common interest among nations, recognizing the value of knowledge possessed by the foreigner is vital as it brings visibility. The lack of inclusion in decision-making places developing countries on a lower scale and becomes the party that has no role but must follow the rule of those who count.Furthermore, people in developing countries become objects that need to be studied through research in exchange for charitable goods and services such as microfinance (Anis Chowdhury, 2009). To the extent that the research conducted provides a valuable perspective for understanding social, political and economic challenges, it provides knowledge externally but not internally (Young, 2000). Additionally, the international development approach does not favor neutral terms, but rather reconstructs the approach of making the unfamiliar familiar. The process of making the unfamiliar familiar is a fixation on what is missing and how this can be improved to reach the universal standard. So, assuming the international standard is that of Western European countries. Treaties often support the universal standard which gives no opportunity to developing countries to negotiate the agreement. For example, the Treaty of Westphalia of 1684 was created to extend international law to non-European international society with the assumption that non-European nations lacked sovereignty. “This process was completed triumphantly through the mechanism of decolonization which ensured the emergence of sovereign states from what were previously colonialized societies in Asia, Africa and the Americas. Seen in this light, colonization was an unfortunate – but perhaps necessary – historical episode whose effects were largely reversed by the role played by international law, particularly through the United Nations system, in promoting of decolonization through both institutional and doctrinal mechanisms. – Anthony Anghie. As historically, international laws influence the maintenance of dominant models of thought and create a divide between developing and developed countries. The notion of viewing different bodies as developing and developed formulates systems of power. This language places people in the position of “us” and “them” and fails, from the outset, to maintain attention on the external perspective (Houle, 2009). The concept of international development as manifested in international law can be both inclusive and exclusive. It must align with a specific ideology of political and economic agenda. Even if politics occupies the bulk of international relations; The economy plays an important role in promoting globalization according to universal principles. “The Bretton Woods conference took place in 1944, when the first phase of decolonization was about to begin with the independence of India in 1947. played some role in shaping the development programs of directly and indirectly – the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. These institutions were created to promote stable exchange rates, foster the growth of global trade, and facilitate international capital movements. _Shirin RaiAs Rai illustrates the principles of development and its categories are man-made but include a certain way of thinking; the principles are based on commerce, the motive is to control and include the language of power. In Inclusion and Democracy, Iris Young highlights the importance of legitimacy. Legitimacy is a decision-making process; the concept of not using politics for competitive purposes but of creating an inclusive space for democratic processes. As democracy discourse is often used primarily in the national-state context, it should also be included in universal regulations and ordinances. Furthermore, Young wishes to maintain and embrace difference; thus, the voice of the people of developing countriesshould be privileged and have access to dialogues. The inequality that exists in the language of international development is a continuation of colonial history. Colonial history presents colonial powers as outsiders and colonies as insiders. In the 21st century, this internal and external dynamic has resulted in growth and development. By allowing developed countries to monitor and regulate the institutional functionality of developing countries, international law neglects the valuable perspective that foreigners have to offer. Given universal principles, the dynamics of insiders and outsiders become complex; and this is because the law used in developing countries is subject to the norms of international law. For example, sub-Saharan African countries turn out to be outsiders because the laws are unfamiliar to them and for developed countries like the United States, they are insiders because the law applies to their cultural values ​​and to their historical context. But what are the implications of being a foreigner in your own national state? How does this affect the functionality and enforcement of laws if they are unfamiliar to the foreign state? Foreigner is a term used to describe a person living in a country that is not their own (Merriam-Webster Dictionary). In the book Democracy and the Foreigner, Bonnie Honig explains the situation of foreigners beyond national borders. For Honig, being a foreigner is not just the idea of ​​being a non-citizen, but it can also be the idea of ​​being a foreigner in one's own country. “The foreigner acts in each case as both a support and a threat to the regime in question” (7). In the context of universal principle, people in developing countries are not only strangers to the regulations and treaties signed to govern their nations, they are also strangers to their own knowledge. People in developing countries have conformed to European civilization and modernity, which has prevented them from seeing their own cultural, political and economic civilization. As development thinking requires a large-scale industrial mechanical approach, developing countries are forced to abandon collective subsistence agriculture to adopt cash crop agriculture (Escobar, 1995). The struggle for development is exclusive and automatically aspires to a symbolic universe that follows a single form of thought. The act of giving order indicates a level of authority and a hieratic structure that formulates modes of exclusion (Young, 2000). It is a conceptual framework constructed with the aim of purifying the global standard. It is exclusive, creates oppositions, forms otherness and makes the insider an outsider with less economic, social or political unification and understanding. Most modes of exclusion are influenced by the notion of personal interest and history. It can also be the language of the civilized and the savage. In most cases, language influences the way individuals construct their perceptions. Being perceived as civilized can automatically give you the opportunity to discriminate and dehumanize others. By perceiving the civilized as knowledgeable and the savage as backward, we create a hieratic language that can be internalized into our thinking, thereby creating divisionism of thought that can then be transferred to our actions. In the section Spontaneity: Its Strength and Weakness, Frantz Fanon highlights themes of the legacy of colonialism, class division, globalization, the influence of commerce on politics, and the complexities of civilization in relation to tradition. And even if these.