Antonia Peacocke, then a student at Harvard University, wrote in her article, Family Guy and Freud: Jokes and Their Relation to the Unknown, the history of the television show Family Guy. She also explains that its content is not meant to be taken very seriously. Peacocke explains the subject in depth, giving the reader his and others' views on the series and its offensive production. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Peacocke informs the reader well about the series, Family Guy, and its “unique” form of entertainment. She also focuses more on the history of the series rather than giving her own opinion on the program. “…. it must be one of the few television shows in history to have been canceled not once, but twice” (300). Peacocke uses past information from the program in chronological order, giving the reader the opportunity to let them decide how they want to view the show before allowing themselves to go further with their opinion. The author includes quotes from the series, but not all of them are as vulgar as they should be. Peacocke offers the reader a broader view of the program rather than simple vulgarity: "In fact, Family Guy is not intended to do harm, and its creators take certain steps to keep it from hitting too hard" (Peacocke 307) . Rather than bluntly telling the reader that some viewers are too disgusted themselves, she admits that the show is vulgar, other times taking it a step further. Peacocke gives the other side of the argument here and there, letting the reader know what arguments are being made against the program. It's a great way for her to present other people's opinions, other than her own. Although the newspaper has its own opinion, Peacocke uses excellent facts, even from the show's creator, to support his argument. However, Peacocke also uses some episodes that go against his opinion of the series, to prove once again that there are times when the program is very offensive to a certain audience. Peacocke says: “Sometimes creators seem to cross paths…. the line of indecency” (308). She covers every part of the TV show, the good and the bad, and doesn't just rely on her word. Peacocke uses not only his own experiences of the show, but also those of other fans and their awards. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay In conclusion, Peacocke uses everything is done and example wisely. Most of the article is based on facts to support its argument and helps the reader choose their view of the program's agenda. It gives a clear idea of ​​the show and how others perceive it, but also other important parts of it, without focusing only on one particular area..