'Wij Zijn In' wants to create a process of choice for future residents of the smart neighborhood of Brainport. This short essay will attempt to resolve the problem statement: what system of judgment should be used in order to select/find future inhabitants and what assumptions does this system consider to be true? - focus on the fairness of the judgment process from a utilitarian point of view. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay There are several utilitarian theories, for example (classical) act utilitarianism or rule utilitarianism, but all are based on the same foundation: achieving “the greatest good for the greatest number”. Often, utilitarianism can be associated with hedonism, because both lead to people's happiness and well-being (good equals pleasant). Furthermore, it is crucial to remember that it is not actions but consequences that matter, making intentions irrelevant. Fairness is one of the most important and common ethical values. The entire democratic world and its justice system are based on the concept that everyone is equal to each other. Yet fairness also means that those at the bottom of the social, economic and political ladder should be most favored (equity). Therefore, this means that people must be in the same position regarding their basic needs (equality). Furthermore, it is important to assert that fairness is considered with actions, processes and consequences, which contradicts utilitarian views (consequences are what matters most). It was previously decided that diversity (the more diverse the better) should be one of the factors affecting the judging system. One of the methods to achieve this can be positive discrimination. Utilitarians would have nothing against this since it leads to the desired results. However, equity requires that everyone has an equal opportunity to be eligible for housing in the neighborhood. This system would not be adapted to equity as an ethical and moral value, because it already denies access to life in the neighborhood to certain groups of people, for example rich or poor, white or black, at the beginning. On the other hand, such a solution is necessary to achieve certain goals. Therefore, a utilitarian would say that this method is fair. The “asylum seeker crisis” can be used to describe this dilemma. On the one hand, this concrete example must be resolved while preserving the values ​​of justice - equality and fairness. The origin of people should play no role in the selection process. Therefore, letting asylum seekers report to district places should be a natural thing. Moreover, it might even be in our interest to invite such people into the neighborhood and enrich it culturally. On the other hand, a utilitarian might say that indeed it would be fair to them, but if most people don't want refugees to leave nearby, it's obvious that they shouldn't be allowed in, which would bring the greatest good to most of the population. citizens in this sense. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay All things considered, one can conclude that it is difficult for fairness as an ethical value to work according to utilitarian moral theory. At the same time, fairness is a relative term. There is no doubt that these two "ingredients" will be necessary to evaluate the best..