Sliced ​​peanut butterL-low complexity, just unpack and put peanut butter is not that bad - pretty high compatibility, anyone making PBJ would just buy this product instead of a jar of PBO - low observability, not many people will notice if you have a slice of peanut butter instead than a spread. For the invention of sliced ​​peanut butter, the biggest problem I see is that the spread of peanut butter isn't really a huge problem that needs to be solved. Additionally, different people may prefer different amounts of peanut butter in their sandwich, something prepackaged slices would not satisfy. This invention has very low complexity. Customers simply unwrap the slice and place it on their sandwich. There are no complicated steps involved in using this product. Peanut butter slices also have great divisibility, as anyone can try using a slice and see how it tastes. However, the relative benefit of peanut butter slices is small, because applying peanut butter from a jar really isn't that complicated. This product has high compatibility. Since it is a very basic product, it would not be difficult for customers to assimilate it into their lives. Finally, product observability is low, as it would be difficult for others to notice that the peanut butter in your sandwich was sliced ​​instead of spread. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”? Get an original essay The target market for this product would be parents of young children. Since they would be the ones making the sandwiches for their children, having a simple method to prepare them would appeal to them. However, overall, I don't think it's that difficult to get the peanut butter out of the jar and spread it on a sandwich. I don't think this product is a major breakthrough in sandwich making methods. Additionally, keeping peanut butter from sticking to plastic requires adding more chemicals to the food, which would not be appealing to customers. One possible solution would be to find a way to squeeze the peanut butter out of the jar, similar to squeeze bottles for products such as jelly and mayonnaise. Overall, I think this product ranks 3rd out of the four products in terms of how quickly and widely it has reached the market. Polytrack Horsetrack surface L - low complexity, simply replace existing track with new Polytrack T - low divisibility, costs $5 million to install so track owners must make the investment a high relative benefit. Less downtime means more racing, less horse injuries means more customersC-high compatibility, tracks would be used a lot during races and would be easily integrated into the racing processO-high observability, horse owners have already indicated that they see the benefits that the new tracks are on their horses and there are also more spectators at the events. I believe this product has very high potential to be successfully adopted in the market. First, Polytrack has low complexity. Since this is a fairly basic technology, no special instructions are needed to use it. However, it is hardly divisible since it costs approximately $5 million to convert the tracksexisting in new Polytrack. This product is not something you can taste or try, it's all or nothing. The relative advantage of this technology is very high. Horses get injured less often and are in much better shape after each race if they run on Polytrack. Since horses are able to race more, racetracks benefit due to increased viewership and therefore more revenue. Since the equipment on the slopes is used every time there is a race, there would be no compatibility issues with this product. Finally, this new Polytrack has great observability. Trainers and riders can quickly learn that this new equipment is extremely beneficial for their horses. Racecourses can quickly find that there is a much larger audience thanks to the new equipment. The target market for this product would of course be racetrack owners since they are the ones who have to make the purchasing decision and install it on their properties. This material could even be widespread in other markets such as human racetracks, providing the same benefits to humans as to horses. Overall, I think this product would be quickly accepted, as shown in the article where it is mentioned that racing executives will be traveling to Turfway to check out the new hardware. Due to the high distribution of this product, I rank it number 1 out of four products.QR Code on tombstoneL-low complexity, the codes can be placed anywhere and are simple to use, just scan them with a applicationT-high divisibility, anyone can just find one of the codes and test it.A-low relative advantage, no one goes to a cemetery to look at other people's graves.C-average compatibility, this QR code can be placed on many different structuresO-low observability, it is necessary to download the specific application. To me, this product does not appear to be an invention of any kind. Nowadays, QR codes can be easily generated online. It seems the only service they offer is to print the code on a sign and put it on a headstone. Considering that only about three dozen have been sold in recent months, the success of this product has been extremely limited. QR codes have low complexity. They can be placed in places other than simple headstones, such as benches, sundials and urns. All you have to do is scan them with an application on your smartphone which will take you to the appropriate website. This product also has very high divisibility. If someone wants to test the product, they just need to find a code and scan it. This would allow them to see exactly how it works and what type of information is provided about the deceased. The biggest problem with this device is that it doesn't offer any relative advantages. People don't often go to cemeteries to learn about the lives of random people who died. This device does not solve any problems or needs, so it will not be easily accepted. This device also has an average level of compatibility. Although it seems like a simple device, using it also requires a smartphone and a specific app. Even though a high percentage of the population owns a smartphone, there are still some who do not own it and therefore cannot use this invention. Finally, this QR code has low observability. Few people go to cemeteries and carefully examine other people's headstones. Plus, even if they see the code, they might not know what to do with it. The target market for this product would be the loved ones of the deceased. It seems that $65 for a QR code is an extremely expensive price.