Education is the guiding light for our successful journey. Education can be described as the process of acquiring understanding, beliefs, values, skills and practices that teach us to be a true human being. Everything we have learned, whether imposed or voluntary, falls within the realm of education. Education, as we understand it here, is a process that invites truth and possibility, encourages and provides time for discovery. It is, as John Dewey (1916) put it, a social process – “a process of life and not a preparation for a future life”. From this perspective, educators seek to act with people rather than with them. This argumentative essay argues that education should be free for all, because education allows younger generations to have a better quality of life and can improve social development. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay From an ethical perspective, it seems unfair that people with less money miss out on more opportunities. Ethically, opportunities should be open to everyone. While it is true that the availability of an opportunity should not guarantee that a person receives that opportunity, that opportunity should not be excluded. For example, everyone should be able to acquire the qualifications necessary to work in air traffic control, and although a blind person is hardly guaranteed access to such a position, this opportunity should not be ruled out by default . Free education, especially free higher education, can open up a number of opportunities that some individuals might not otherwise benefit from, and while these opportunities are not guaranteed, they should not be excluded by default, thereby occurs when some individuals are unable to benefit from free higher education. Free education for all can reduce social problems. We learn morality through education, so we will know what is right and what is wrong. It can reduce social problems because we can think rationally about what is right and wrong. Free education should therefore have economic objectives. If a student is truly seeking higher education and is not looking for a reason to do nothing and have fun for years exploiting other people's tax dollars through free education, then that person can benefit from a long education process. For example, a student pursuing a series of law degrees will need five to seven years of study, which is also very expensive. If eligibility costs were waived, such an individual may be able to accept employment intermittently, extend their eligibility period, and take more time to obtain these qualifications more comfortably. Instead of having to spend years as a low-income student while accumulating debt and perhaps getting involved in social issues, such a student can devote more time to his or her qualifications and work while still student so that they can enjoy a more comfortable educational experience. free education should be free because it would reduce the unemployment rate and fewer people would benefit from government assistance. Education should be free for everyone, regardless of your identity and race. Because it can significantly reduce the poverty rate by giving people the skills and knowledge to qualify for a particular job. For example, according to McFarlin, it