Table of ContentsShould Parents Control Their Children's Lives?Parental Control and AuthorityConclusionWorks CitedShould Parents Control Their Children's Lives ?An important milestone in every person’s life is the birth of their first child. Nothing compares to the feeling you get when you look down and see the eyes of this little human you helped create. The joy felt by new parents is almost indescribable. However, this moment passes too quickly and the little human grows up. From the first exploration to the first step to the first words spoken, all these little milestones bring great joy to new parents every day. This joy is naturally associated with a lot of difficulties. Parents struggle to give the best to their children. They worry about their safety, their education and their future. They care for the child and provide an environment conducive to their growth and development. A child will generally adore his parents and be grateful for the sacrifices they make. When the child reaches adolescence and reaches adolescence, there is an undeniable change in momentum. This change is unfortunately inevitable, and because of this time in a child's life, many say that parents cannot control adolescents. While it is certainly true that adolescents are difficult to control, it is difficult to speculate with certainty that parents cannot control adolescents. It is also not correct to say that parents do not have the right to control the life of a child over 16 years old. Because they do, and when they are involved, it creates a better future for the child, due to many variables such as financial stability, guidance. and affection, among others. The individual has a better percentage of success thanks to parental involvement. So should parents control their children's lives? The essay to answer this question will address the issue of parental control and authority in children's lives. Say no to plagiarism. Get a custom essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essayParental Control and AuthorityTeen rebellion is driving the controversy surrounding parents and their right to control a child over 16 years old. is the main characteristic associated with children aged 14 to 18 years. In some cases, rebellion may begin prematurely at age 9 and last until the adolescent moves beyond adolescence and becomes a young adult. Children generally rebel against society or parental authority. Rebellion is second nature to a teenager and comes naturally. They do not necessarily rebel to hurt their parents, but this disobedience causes conflict. And this conflict is why some believe parents should give up control of their children's lives after they turn 16. Irreconcilable Differences is a Hollywood film in which actress Drew Barrymore plays a nine-year-old girl who divorces her parents. Although this may seem hysterical to some, it is actually a widespread practice in today's world. The official term for the bizarre idea of ​​a child divorcing his parents is emancipation. Emancipation is when the child is granted the legal right by a court to separate from their parents due to irreconcilable differences. It's the same premise of divorce, but involving two different parties. If emancipation is accepted in society today, it was not considered asnormal in the 19th and 20th centuries. Styles and forms of parenting are changing rapidly. In the past, parents had more freedom to discipline their children as they saw fit: spanking and yelling were encouraged to promote good behavior. On the other hand, in modern society, if a parent lays a hand on their child, it can be considered abusive and can even be taken to court. The word "no" is generally discouraged in modern parenting. These changes in parental ideals caused a breakdown in the relationship between a child and parent, and raised the question of how much control a parent should have over an adolescent's life. Another perspective we need to consider when discussing the issue of parental control after the age of 16 is that of cultural context. There are some major differences between the way children are raised in Western cultures and the way they are raised in Eastern cultures. It is generally believed that children from Eastern cultures have stricter parents who do not let them "leave the nest" from a young age. From their formative years, children from Western backgrounds are encouraged to think outside the box and gain independence. They usually leave home at the age of 18 to pursue education or other career dreams. Parents encourage their children to explore the world while Eastern parents encourage their children to stay close to home as a protective measure. This is why the notion of how much control a parent should have over a child's life varies from culture to culture. It can also vary depending on individual beliefs. A child is trained by his parents. They spend 9 months in their mother's womb, and mothers usually endure the painful process of labor to bring their child into the world. Parents earn money and raise their children, providing them with everything they need to the best of their ability for a long period of time. This gives them a certain right to the child's life. After spending so many resources and investing so much money, why wouldn't they get anything in return? If an investor were to invest a large amount of money and time into a business, they would do everything in their power to reap the rewards and make that business a success. In the early stages of life, a child achieves many achievements. However, these achievements pale in comparison to what they will achieve after the age of 16. Obtaining a diploma, marriages and the birth of a first child: these are all stages in a person's life and are generally accomplished after the age of 16. have the right to have a say in these major events and they also have the right to attend these major events. Every little thing a child accomplishes brings so much joy to parents and they have the right to participate in these memorable occasions. “At $1.3 trillion, American student debt is almost incomprehensibly large” (Kopf, 2018). It is common knowledge that in Western cultures, students take out loans to pay for higher education. Parents are generally only expected to pay for high school, which is an obligation. Higher education is more of a choice. Parents can help obtain these loans, but they are usually placed in the student's name. On the other hand, the procedure in Eastern cultures is a little different. Parents are expected to pay for their child's higher education. If the loans are taken out from a financial institute, they are generally placedin the name of the parents and are reimbursed by the parents rather than the child. When parents have the freedom to have more control over a child's life, it is beneficial for the child because it means financial stability. This financial security comes at a price, but weighing both sides, we see that it is well worth it. Life after 16 is hard enough, and with the added financial worry, it can become almost unbearable. It is therefore better to cede some control to your parents and ensure your financial stability. There is a saying that "you should always trust gray hairs, because they have been through more than you can imagine." Old people know more than us. do, it's a fact. Most of the things we experience as teenagers and most of the emotions and feelings we try to navigate and sort through, they've already experienced. When going through a difficult situation, it is always better to trust the wisdom of your parents. In the majority of situations, they have your best interests at heart and want to see you succeed. This advice can sometimes be misinterpreted as a form of excess and control. If you were traveling from point A to point B and you knew an easier way to get to point B from point A, you would share that knowledge with others. This is done with the good intention of making life easier for others. It's the same thing parents do when they offer ideas, suggestions and advice. Not everything has to be a struggle for control, not everything has to be a battle. We can offer them some leeway, control certain situations in order to avoid the mistakes they have already made. Parents often want better for their children than what they had, which can cause them to be a bit controlling and even aggressive, but they do so with the child's best interest at heart. Giving up control is not the solution, but understanding the intentions behind the need for control is the answer. When we look at the need, the intentions are clear: a better future for the child. Peer pressure takes many forms. It could be the pressure to smoke a cigarette, drink a beer, or even the pressure to lose your virginity before you're ready. Peer pressure changes the way you think. This leads to many conflicts, mainly between children and parents. When these conflicts arise, the child tends to take the side of his peers. They fear that if they don't, it will lead to isolation and social anxiety. This usually develops into suicidal tendencies. Siding with your peers usually presents itself as the safest option and teenagers tend to take this route and ignore their parents' wishes. If a parent were not present, a child would have no one to turn to other than their peers. This is a huge problem. Peers are usually people you associate with who are close to your age. They are also still figuring out how to approach the daily problems that life presents. In most cases, peer solutions rarely help adolescents, and parents or elders can usually offer more effective advice. The presence of a parent also increases the percentage of responsibility. The saying is true: “you can never really control a teenager,” but the feeling of responsibility brought on by the presence of a parental figure creates a feeling of fear. This feeling of fear unconsciously causes the child to think twice before taking action. At the very heart of the most controlling parentlies love and affection towards one's child. Even the “tiger moms” of Southeast Asia, known for working too much and controlling their children, have love at the heart of everything they do. They work too much and scold their children because they want to see them succeed in the future. They have good intentions but express them in a negative way. People are different, everyone is unique and therefore each parent has a different parenting style and a different way of expressing love to their children. Loving parental support is essential at any age of a child's life. This claim can be supported by a study done at UCLA. “a loving parental figure can change neural circuits in children” the presence of a positive parental figure can improve a child's lifelong health, while the lack of love and affection from the from a parental figure can have mental and physical consequences on the child. life. A child may seek to fill a parent's lack of love through a variety of other sources. However, nothing can fill this void and the child may turn to many bad influences such as drugs and pornography. At any point in a child's life, this love is necessary to form a whole and happy human being. It is an irreplaceable love and nothing can replace it. This is essential for children well beyond the age of 16. When parents are still allowed to control their children after the age of 16, it is ultimately better for both the child and the parent. We can see how much more direction and accountability there is. It is clear that the success rate for the future is also higher with parental involvement. The fact that parental love is essential to a child's growth and well-being is supported by scientific facts. Despite these points, people still believe that parental rights and controls should end before the age of 16 for the sake of the child. People argue that children have the right to choose their own dreams and can become more independent when their parents let go of the reins. They also say it can be beneficial for parents because they do not face a financial burden and can save for retirement. Each person is entitled to their own rights. This statement applies to all children, regardless of age. As a child grows up and reaches the end of adolescence, they want to speak out more about their own rights and begin to question their parents. It is true that a child should be able to decide on major aspects of their future, but the problem is that their brain is not equipped and is not fully capable of making important decisions and needing the help from a parent. Parental controls do not necessarily take away a child's right. The child still has their individual right and can express themselves at any time, but they have a safety net in the form of a parent. A controlling parent does not mean the child has no rights; it simply means that the child's rights are somewhat limited. And in this case, boundaries are good because they provide the child with a backup plan. A key point of conflict between parents and children is when the child is preparing to choose a career path. In most situations, children gravitate towards what they are passionate about and parents, on the other hand, encourage a career path that offers more stability. Both points of view are valid because if it is a passion-driven career the child will enjoy it more and if it is a financially stable career it is a bit more practical for the future of the child. It is not because parents and children.