In a professional setting, the priority always tends to be doing the right thing rather than doing things well. This mindset can sometimes lead an employee down the wrong path: if you do the right thing, but you don't do it correctly, failure is a very real possibility. On the other end of the spectrum, if you choose to do something good, but it's not the right thing to do, that can also result in failure. In many ways, ensuring that attention to both ends of this spectrum is maintained will lead to the most positive outcome possible. This way of approaching the situation essentially involves two types of thinking: strategic and tactical. Strategic thinkers tend to be more involved in doing the right things and viewing situations from a leadership perspective. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”? Get an original essay The problem with being a purely strategic thinker and therefore only doing the right things is that these people tend to analyze the scenario but often fail to do so. take the necessary measures. For example, a company might be tasked with carrying out a building design for a client, a strategic thinker will approach this task as a leader, and although they have the right assets to use to complete this work, they may not implement its assets in a way that allows the company to complete the job on time and within budget. It is therefore important for strategic thinkers to always maintain a sense of urgency, as inaction can result in wasted time and money for the company they work for. Tactical thinkers, on the other hand, believe that doing things right is the right way to approach situations and tend to view them from a managerial perspective. The problem with being solely a tactical thinker is that these people often focus all their energy on completing the task at hand, rather than thinking about the outcome. For example, if a consulting firm is looking to find new clients, a strategic thinker may suggest adopting the cold calling method to find new clients. Although this can lead to potential customers in the future, this method is sometimes not extremely effective in a practical context – therefore, this method of finding new customers shows that doing things right is not always the right more efficient. Therefore, the action is usually not effective and sometimes even unnecessary, which could have easily been avoided if they had analyzed the situation before taking action. In conclusion, to succeed in a professional environment, strategic and tactical thinking methods must be implemented. Strategic thinkers tend to do the right things but fail to take action where tactical thinkers would do things right but sometimes fail to see the big picture. If both ways of thinking are combined, the employee, and ultimately the company they work for, will be most successful. Works Cited: American Psychological Association. (2021). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: in-group love and out-group hatred? Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 429-444. Gottlieb, MC and Marcum, JP (2019). Naming and identity: A cross-cultural examination of the name-letter effect. Social Psychology and Personality Sciences, 10(3), 398-406. Hepper,, 85(2),, 76(3), 537-552.