Groups and organizations create structures that can be interpreted as the rules and resources of the organization. These structures in turn create social systems in an organization. Groups and organizations achieve independent living through the way their members use structures. Structures to guide decision-making in groups and organizations. A social communicator must be ready to face any situation and organization, previously studying the organization to which he will belong, knowing its values, principles and philosophy, with this we move forward and could possibly display - is - the culture of the organization. “Rules are used by a staff member as expectations for behavior and communication within the group” Giddens p.234. It is therefore worth mentioning that within groups and organizations there are rules that, although not implicit in any document, are more fundamental in setting a precedent for how we should behave and how communicate with different groups; the key - in my opinion - is to correctly decipher these rules and apply them in the context of communication within the organization. To adapt, we need to interact with the environment and everything about the organization, absorb it and define what the key points are - referring to the key points as the main sources of business information, as clearly shown in the Adaptive restructuring theory, becoming new members of the social integration of the organization can in many cases be a process that takes time, while the communicator is more familiar. As we reflected on ourselves and how others fit into the group, we began to act and use communication in a way that indicates that we expect articles that respond to each of the members. .... middle of paper ...... The analysis between conflicts and contradictions (unlike the Marxist) has the same analytical emphasis on the structured and structuring aspects of the field of work and its implications for the overprotected relations between agency and coercion in the processes of individual and collective reproduction and transformation. Ultimately, the undercutting of this field in social contexts is likely to be the origin of its analysis of contradictions in social relations and specifically of the contradictions of contemporary societies, and then to echo the analysis by Claus Offe on the “commodification” of large branches of services and labor. . The abdication and elucidation of the structural contradictions of capital and its impact on the social whole, contradictions, even in the rarefied conditions of the post-war class struggle, have generated extremely perverse consequences for being social..