Over the years, NATO has worked with countries around the world to foster and develop strategic partnerships that enable the organization to support its global allies and project power beyond Europe. One of the countries with which NATO has developed close relations is Israel, which is officially recognized as a Major Non-Member Partner (MNMP). Events in the Middle East have made NATO's collaboration with countries like Israel more important than ever, particularly on intelligence sharing and counterterrorism operations. However, this relationship is not without controversy due to Israel's stance towards the Palestinians and its occupation of the West Bank, which has drawn criticism from many European NATO members. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on 'Why violent video games should not be banned'? Get an original essay At the heart of the matter is the question of how far, if at all, NATO should seek to deepen its relationship with Israel and what conditions could be attached to such an agreement. The topic also aims to encourage delegates to consider NATO's role in global security outside its traditional sphere of influence, particularly at a time when many NATO members face a growing threat of Islamist extremism. In addition to this, delegates will also need to consider the implications of increased cooperation with Israel for international agreements such as the Iran nuclear deal and for the alliance's commitment to collective defense. Israel's relationship with the United Nations, as the most important international organization, illustrates this well. The right of the Jewish state to exist was confirmed by the General Assembly in November 1947 when it approved the partition of Palestine by a two-thirds majority. Later, as the UN's membership grew and the Cold War forced the two superpowers to compete for the loyalty of new members, things changed. No country has been censored more often by either the General Assembly or the Security Council. In fact, the only thing that often stood in the way of Israel and more condemnation was the United States. Jerusalem has also never been able to secure a seat on the Security Council. At first glance, relations between Israel and NATO should be better. Founded only a year after Israel, NATO was made up of Christian states, with one exception, starting in 1952: Turkey. No NATO member had a fundamental disagreement with the existence of the Jewish state, and most voted in favor of its creation. Furthermore, Israel's values ​​have always been liberal – although initially with a strong socialist connotation – and democratic. Partly for this reason, partly because Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion feared that his country would find itself isolated in the event of another world war, Jerusalem adopted a pro-Western stance during the Cold War. Of course, there was a price to pay for this. The more pro-Western Jerusalem's position, the more problematic its relations with the Eastern bloc. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay During the 1950s, many Israelis believed themselves to be in mortal danger from the surrounding Arab world. Looking for allies, they would have loved for their country to join NATO or at least become an affiliate member...