-
Essay / Comparative Analysis of Between the World and Me and Hillbilly Elegy
The two books, Between the World and Me and Hillbilly Elegy, have very unique procedures of existence. One is to overcome your flaws and everything horrible to become something great and new, while the alternative is to stand out and think the world is against you. Vance, who wrote the book Hillbilly Elegy, is a completely positive person, although Coates is extremely pessimistic and is known to back down when problems arise. These books are comparable because they both show that life can get in the way of depending on your inheritance and that society doesn't always take care of you. Yet they are unique because unlike Coates, Vance attempts to triumph over this challenge. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay In Between the World and Me, Coates could be very conflicted with the way African Americans are treated. He no longer likes the way he is placed in a class and judged based on the label that society offers him. This leads him to a life of hatred and isolation, as he believes that if he frees the arena, they will not be able to judge him. The story continues to show him writing letters to his son telling him that he is unhappy with his life and no longer likes the way he is being treated. Yet at one point in all of this, he does nothing to try to turn his life around. Vance is very different. In his e-book he is aware that he is not always in a very good part of society, or at least a part that is not always definitely considered by society. Like Coates, Vance is unhappy with the situation, but the difference between them is that Vance is actively trying to exchange his lifestyle and elevate himself, so the precedents society has placed on him are unprofessional. Ways Vance attempted to better himself include joining the military and getting a job at a younger age to prove he was no longer what he once indulged himself into. Coates did not try this. Instead, he writes to his son to complain about his health, but no longer tries to change anything. This is a toxic state of mind to stay in. When you are in a place where you are sad, it is your responsibility to get out of it, because otherwise you risk drawing yourself into this constant cycle of distress and then starting to cause it in the humans around you, which are exactly what Coates did to his son. Trying to pressure his son with his terrible attitude was in no way acceptable just because he was sad about his situation in life. Both people also have very specific views on politics. As Vance candidly stated, “Barack Obama gets to the heart of our personal insecurities. He is a good father when many of us are not. He wears suits for his job and we don coveralls, if we're lucky enough to have a job in any way. His wife tells us we shouldn't feed certain meals to our children, and we hate her for it – no longer because we think she's wrong, but because we understand she's right. This really expresses Vance's point of view on a lot of things. He explains how superior beauty can be very extraordinary compared to what are considered hillbillies and that Barack Obama is very different from the mountain population and therefore cannot sympathize with that. Coates's point of view is somewhat the same. In one of his writings, "Americans agree on the reality of..