Also known as gender egalitarianism or gender equality, gender equality is a view that every individual should be treated equally in all aspects of life (health, education, employment, leadership) without any discrimination. on the basis of gender (Jayachandran, 2014). Under the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights, one of the main objectives is to strengthen gender equality in social and legal contexts. Such situations include democratic activities and ensuring equal pay for work for all genders. This can only be achieved when men and women are afforded similar opportunities and rights in decision-making, economic participation, leadership opportunities and valuing and promoting the diverse needs and aspirations of both sexes. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”? Get an original essay In practice, the main goal of gender equality is to help people achieve equal treatment in life. society as a whole, not only in politics and the workplace, but also in all other institutions of life. However, this is not the case in different countries, regions, social and religious groups since, as shown by the representation of gender roles, women do not enjoy equal treatment to men. Specifically, this is a common trend in developing countries where the female gender is seen as subordinate and therefore undeserving of being granted rights and opportunities for certain religious, political and social roles. This will be the main objective of this paper, that is, to explore the main current trends in gender gaps between groups, countries and regions. The main gender gap patterns that this paper will examine are the correlation between economic development and gender equality as well as between the overall development of the country and gender equality. It will also analyze some of the arguments of other researchers like Duflo and Jayachandran explaining some of the possible causes of these trends and providing an individual perspective on these discrepancies. Since time immemorial, gender bias has been a problem. which has existed and particularly favored men while compromising the rights and opportunities of women. In a few other cases, men's rights have also been compromised in situations where certain professions such as nursing are considered exclusively female while some men have the potential and ability to take on these roles and in a few other similar circumstances . However, with the rise of gender equality movements like the United Nations, stricter gender rule legislation and affirmative action, gender inequality has gradually decreased and currently: men actively occupy and Increasingly jobs in professions previously considered feminine, women can assume religious and political responsibilities. In these roles, women can take their husband's surname immediately after marriage and boys and girls can access equality in education and social opportunities. However, this trend is not uniform throughout the world since it only appears in a good number of developed countries and very few developing countries. In most developing countries, as shown in the World Bank (World Development Indicators) dataset, the ratio ofMale to female enrollment in higher education is on a downward slope when compared to gross domestic GDP per capita. The trend is also similar for secondary and primary education where the enrollment gap is negative. Also in terms of employment, as reported by the World Bank, the number of men active in the labor market far exceeds that of their female counterparts. Taking the example of India, a woman's chances of working are a third of those of a man; similar trends are also reported in North African countries and the Middle East (Jayachandran, 2014). In marriages, a good number of individuals in developed countries conform to the fact that women should be given more decision-making responsibilitiespower over decisions regarding the child's development, visits from friends and family. family as well as other household-related activities. On the contrary, most of their counterparts in developing countries believe that household decision-making should be a male affair with very minimal participation from women. Jayachandran (2014) argues that the main possible reason for this trend could be the need to improve a child's development and that women's internal decisions can only be seen as one aspect of their well-being. From a personal point of view, this argument is valid given that in most cases where women's decisions are not tolerated, the obvious perception is that they are subordinate. Therefore, raising a well-developed child, as Jayachandran (2014) argues, requires that decisions come from “the higher being, man.” For freedom of choice and life satisfaction, most women in developing countries believe that they have very limited control over their lives compared to their female counterparts in developed countries. This is based on data collected by World Values ​​Survey (WVS) in a study to determine the level of freedom of choice and life satisfaction of women in developing countries. The data resulting from the survey also indicates that for women in North African countries, the Middle East and India, freedom of choice is more of a dream than a reality (Jayachandran, 2012). This provides a key gender gap model where there is a direct correlation between work participation of a given gender and the level of life satisfaction and freedom of choice. This is true since the regions and countries mentioned above are the same ones where the participation of men in the labor market is three times that of women, as noted in the previous sections of this document. Also, based on previous sections of this paper, an apparent trend in the gender gap is the role of economic stability in enhancing or limiting gender equality. An obvious fact is that gender inequality, in which men are favored in matters of higher education enrollment, primary and secondary education, freedom of life, freedom of choice and decision-making power in marriage, is endemic only in the least economically stable countries. According to Jayachandran (2012), the more a country develops economically, the higher the chances of gender equality. Below are some of the ways that level of development influences gender parity. Male production is the first argument that Jayachandran (2012) presents as one of the key links between economic stability and gender equality. Taking an example of agricultural production where the key factor is physical strength, he argues that the result here is aless participation in work by women compared to men who are well endowed with physical strength. This consequently results in gender inequality, in which men might appear to be more advantaged. However, if women are to undertake only mental work where physical strength is not considered, then as the country develops, more women are likely to be employed than men, leading to a other gender imbalance. However, if development occurs at a relatively slow rate and both sexes can hold both jobs, the resulting outcome is gender parity. Based on this argument, Jayachandran (2012) is apparently right since developing countries are apparently still predominantly oriented towards agriculture-based production. thus offering more work opportunities to men. In this state, women are unemployed, cannot fend for themselves and are dependent on working men. This consequently gives rise to limited freedom of life for women, compromised decision-making and gender-based violence. All this increases because women being dependent on them makes men feel superior while women are doomed to inferiority. Apparently, as Jayachandran (2012) argues, economic development is a key factor towards achieving gender parity and it is indisputable that it is the key. This is the reason behind gender inequality in developing countries. The key indicator of economic development is advanced technology, high household income and good infrastructure. With these factors in place, domestic production will likely be more efficient with minimal labor requirements. This implies that women who play a key role in carrying out household production activities will have more of their time available and will therefore have sufficient free time to carry out other work. The obvious result here will be greater absorption of women into the labor market. In developed countries this is the case and is the cause of gender balance in the regions. In underdeveloped countries, women still have to manually carry out production activities at home, limiting the time they can spend on other jobs. One of the main reasons for gender imbalance in the regions. According to this argument, Jayachandran (2012) is partly right given that there are some developing countries like India and Middle East countries with relatively good infrastructure and better domestic production technologies, but there are still has gender bias in employment. This is due to cultural barriers, customary beliefs and religious practices that prevent women from being absorbed into the labor market. On the other hand, if given enough free time and in the absence of any other obstacles, women are likely to be absorbed into the labor market, allowing them to fend for themselves. Once this goal is achieved, all other sources of gender imbalance are sealed. In summary, Jayachandran's (2012) arguments indicate that most gender gaps in almost all areas are largely in developing countries compared to developed countries. This can be attributed in particular to low economic development, traditional production methods and cultural and religious beliefs favoring men. For this to change and to achieve gender equality, these countries will need to move from agriculture to production based on.