Reconciliation is a difficult term and there is very little agreement on its definition. Indeed, reconciliation is both a process – a means to an end – and a goal itself – something to be achieved. The confusion of these two ideas gives rise to much controversy. The main goal of reconciliation is a long-term aspiration, something essential to strive for, perhaps even an ideal state to hope for. But the process is a present tense way of understanding how things happen exactly – building a reconciliation process is the way to work, practically and effectively, towards that end goal – and doesn't have much value in self. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay There are many occasions where reconciliation could be used as a word for the betterment of the situation. The goal of our commission is reconciliation after widespread and prolonged violent conflict. This is generally what we call a post-conflict situation: the war has ended, a settlement has been reached, but a new regime is struggling to build a new society from the dust of the old. [1][n1]There are some very simple but profound steps to breaking down this reconciliation process to understand its complexities. It's not just a process: it's a long-term process. There is no miracle cure for reconciliation. It takes its time and its pace certainly cannot be dictated. It is also a very profound process: it involves an acceptance of a vague reality that requires changes in our aspirations, our attitudes, our feelings and emotions, perhaps even our beliefs. Such significant change is often a painful challenge and cannot be imposed or rushed. Finally, reconciliation is also a very broad process. This applies to all of us. This is not just a process reserved for those who have inflicted suffering. The attitudes and beliefs that propagate violent conflict spread much further across a community and must be analyzed at this broader level. Especially immediately after the negotiated resolution of a violent conflict, the process of reconciliation is not simple, it can seem to be an obstacle to the achievement of more important priorities. It is actually very tempting, especially for politicians, to focus on the political process, given the urgent political pressures to establish the newly agreed democratic structures, resource pressure and time constraints. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a custom paper now from our expert writers. Get a custom essay Indeed, they may not see how to involve reconciliation in the mass of all the work ahead of them. Thus, reconciliation may be slowed down and delayed until other preferences are completed, or reconciliation may also be reduced to a quick commission of inquiry that will take into account the painful past and move forward quickly. Everyone wants to move on, move on and get away from the past as quickly as possible. Works Cited: Stone, R. (2019). Modern contract law. Routledge.McKendrick, E. (2017). Contract law: text, cases and documents. Oxford University Press. Cheshire, G. and Fifoot, CHS (2012). Cheshire, Fifoot and Furmston Contract Law. Oxford University Press. Beale, H., Bishop, W.D., & Furmston, MP (2019). Contract law. Oxford University Press. Elliott, C. and Quinn, F. (2018). Contract law. Pearson.